total descendants::9 total children::1 |
preco chybaju kvalitne vyskumy? lebo nedostali funding. to je zacarovany kruh. uh, vzhladom na to ze na homeopatii sa celkom slusne zaraba - v Indii je to napriklad sucast statom podporovanej mediciny - nepokladam tento argument za validny. Keby existoval kvalitny vyskum ktory dokaze efektivitu homeopatik, uz davno by sme o nom vedeli. Takto vieme iba o tych kvalitnych studiach, ktore efektivitu homeopatik nepreukazali. ze by som nerobila jednoznacne zavery Nerob, ja ich robim a na dostatocne pevnom zaklade. Prihodim este jedno vyjadrenie z Lancetu, s ktorym suhlasim: I would hope that homoeopaths might now divert their attention to performing randomised controlled (albeit unblinded) trials comparing “visiting a homoeopathy clinic” against “general practitioner's treatment as usual”, since this might be the clinical question of more interest to patients—ie, not “do the pills work better than placebo” but “will the experience of visiting a homoeopath help me to feel better?” http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(08)60448-1/fulltext edit: aj tu je to pekne vystihnute A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||