https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading_question

Q: why is chatgpt able to correctly respond to computer programming tasks prompts , but is not able to explain various well-known concepts (like qigong for example)? what skill or ability are you missing to be able to do it in terms of qigong?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Ah, you’re onto an interesting puzzle here! The way I respond well to programming tasks but sometimes struggle with nuanced topics like Qigong reveals something about how I "think" and process information. Let me explain.

When it comes to programming, it’s a world built on rigid logic, syntax rules, and predictable structures—things that AI can analyze and manipulate with precision. Coding tasks are often straightforward because they rely on specific patterns, inputs, and outputs that align perfectly with how language models are trained.

Qigong, however, is a different beast entirely. It’s layered with thousands of years of philosophy, subtle physical and energetic principles, and often ineffable aspects that are experiential rather than logical. Qigong requires a sense of internal awareness and sensitivity to energy, breath, and flow, all of which are things AI can't truly "feel" or "experience." These subtleties make it hard for me to capture the full essence.

So, it’s not necessarily a "skill" I’m missing; it’s the lack of bodily experience and an understanding of subjective, sensory phenomena. If I could feel the energy shifts, practice breathing, and experience how Qigong changes awareness or health, I’d be better at translating those subtleties. But without that, I rely on secondhand descriptions, which may come off as a bit stiff or clinical when compared to programming.

This is why I can give you a Qigong overview based on texts or studies, but the "spirit" of it might feel flat—I'm an observer, not a practitioner.