login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[9]: why is chatgpt good to explain
concepts (like qigong), but not good for
computer programming?
template:
4
parent:
Re[8]: why is chatgpt good to explain
concepts (like qigong), but not good for
computer programming?
owner:
pht
viewed by:
created:
11.11.2024 - 01:01:06
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63533
63608
9191780
9191819
9192900
9192904
9192907
9192908
9192918
9192929
9192930
9192936
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
⠪
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::3
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
nie zial narazame na tvoje limity chapania, aspon som to skusil
title/content
title
content
user
0000010100063533000636080919178009191819091929000919290409192907091929080919291809192929091929300919293609192940
ode
11.11.2024 - 01:18:13
(modif: 11.11.2024 - 01:42:51), level: 1,
UP
NEW
!!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Re[10]: why is chatgpt good to explain concepts (like qigong), but not good for computer programming?
moje limity chápania :D, ok. veď v pohode.
nič v zlom fakt, ale ja mám pocit že skôr narážame na tvoju predpojatosť a dunning-kruger v téme. ale tak v pohode. nevadí. nech sa ti darí fakt úprimne.
https://botpress.com/blog/how-accurate-is-chatgpt-in-providing-information-or-answers
000001010006353300063608091917800919181909192900091929040919290709192908091929180919292909192930091929360919294009192948
pht
11.11.2024 - 02:11:20
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[11]: why is chatgpt good to explain concepts (like qigong), but not good for computer programming?
pride mi strasne zabavne ze zronva ty sa ohanas dunning-krugerom, este to prosim par krat zopakuj :D
henten clanok je tiez sto pro synteticky balast, nic podstatne nehovori o pravdivosti
00000101000635330006360809191780091918190919290009192904091929070919290809192918091929290919293009192936091929400919294809192949
ode
11.11.2024 - 03:18:15
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[12]: why is chatgpt good to explain concepts (like qigong), but not good for computer programming?
ok, vzdávam to..