 |
|
| node: | Re[5]: 02.03.2020-22:57:31 |
| template: | 4 |
| parent: | Re[4]: 02.03.2020-22:57:31 |
| owner: | studenyRadiator |
| viewed by: | |
| created: | 05.03.2020 - 08:12:50 |
|
cwbe coordinatez: 101 8333809 8837211 8703087 8716924 8716931 8716941 8717054 8718190 8718221 ABSOLUT KYBERIA |
| permissions | |
| you: | r, |
| system: | public |
| net: | yes |
total descendants::3
total children::1
Nepisu, ze su striktne proti, ale ze to doporucuju a uprimne tie dovody su hlavne, ak nie iba ekonomicke.
Ja som celkom zvedavy ako dopadne Izrael, ktory je v tejto oblasti jeden z najprisnejsich. Moze sa to potom pouzit case study pre ludstvo do buducnosti.
WHO:
"In general, evidence shows that restricting the movement of people and goods during public health emergencies is ineffective in most situations and may divert resources from other interventions. Furthermore, restrictions may interrupt needed aid and technical support, may disrupt businesses, and may have negative social and economic effects on the affected countries. However, in certain circumstances, measures that restrict the movement of people may prove temporarily useful, such as in settings with few international connections and limited response capacities. "
Ja som celkom zvedavy ako dopadne Izrael, ktory je v tejto oblasti jeden z najprisnejsich. Moze sa to potom pouzit case study pre ludstvo do buducnosti.
WHO:
"In general, evidence shows that restricting the movement of people and goods during public health emergencies is ineffective in most situations and may divert resources from other interventions. Furthermore, restrictions may interrupt needed aid and technical support, may disrupt businesses, and may have negative social and economic effects on the affected countries. However, in certain circumstances, measures that restrict the movement of people may prove temporarily useful, such as in settings with few international connections and limited response capacities. "