chyba toho este dost vela .)
to co pises je pekne, ale ako si to predstavujes technicky s tym 'precvaknutim'? problem je medzi inym v tom, ze ak chces tvorit nejaky nedeterministicky inferencny engine (taky co ma sancu v nejakom momente zacyklenia 'precvaknut') musis to tak nejak voperd zabezpecit, aby sa to udialo. dokonca aj keby si to spravil ako nejaku emergentnu ficuru tak taketo veci tam nezacnu vznikat len tak same od seba.
mozno sa skusme zamysliet, ci termin vedomie je vobec v pohode na oznacovanie takychto javov. mne sa zda, ze to strasne zavana antropocentrizmom a predstave umelej inteligencie ako niecoho co musi byt nutne podobne ludskej mysli. to je asi aj jeden z dovodov, preco nemam rad uvahy motajuce sa okolo turingovho testu.

Only one third of a search engine is devoted to fulfilling search requests. The other two thirds are divided between crawling (sending a host of single-minded digital organisms out to gather information) and indexing (building data structures from the results). Ed's job was to balance the resulting loads.

When Ed examined the traffic, he realized that Google was doing more than mapping the digital universe. Google doesn't merely link or point to data. It moves data around. Data that are associated frequently by search requests are locally replicated—establishing physical proximity, in the real universe, that is manifested computationally as proximity in time. Google was more than a map. Google was becoming something else. ...

ENGINEERS' DREAMS By George Dyson
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/dysong08/dysong08_index.html