http://philpapers.org/archive/LICTIO-2.pdf

tie body a), b), c) sú odstupňované a v b), c) autor vysvetľuje takto:

It may be that an individual does not want to be subjugated
to an action, even if that action would benefit them greatly,
and the lack of consent renders such an action morally
unjustified. The exception to this might be the lack of
informed consent. If someone is acting irrationally, and
if there is good reason to believe the person is irrational,
then some action that would have significant benefits
for the individual can be justifiably performed; for example,
in the case of medicating someone who is suicidal.

Although someone may not consent or benefit from punishment
for their crimes, such conditions are not necessary
for the acceptability of punishment. For example, Bob
robbed a bank, and it is not in his interest to go to prison;
however, Bob committed a serious crime and deserves to
be punished.

nechcem to zase opakovať, ale na základe toho záujmu sa robia potraty ťažkých genetických porúch - počítame s tým, že kvalita jeho života nie je v jeho záujme a nechávame matku nech sa rozhodne

potrat imho nie je analogický príklad- lebo meníš premisu z počatia na potrat
potrat per se nepodporuje antinatalizmus - ak by platilo, že od splodenia je život hodný ochrany, s tým už antinatalizmus nemá čo robiť, ani s akýmkoľvek iným zabíjaním- je rozdiel medzi zabitím a neprivedením na svet