cwbe coordinatez:
101
63539
63556
1122092
6605649
6607571
6607722
6607744
6607811
6607864
6607919
6608010
6608048
6608118
6608290
6608344
6608757

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::9
total children::1
2 ❤️


show[ 2 | 3] flat


ako skeptik limitovany vedeckymi studiami a relevantnymi dokazmi by ta prave mala zaujimat odpoved na otazku preco u nas musis, a inde mozes




000001010006353900063556011220920660564906607571066077220660774406607811066078640660791906608010066080480660811806608290066083440660875706608857
OsiRi$
 OsiRi$      18.04.2012 - 07:15:46 , level: 1, UP   NEW
preco by mala? mna zaujima fakticka pravda (tj ci funguje ockovanie, ako to funguje atd) a nie "preco u nas ano a inde nie". to nema nijaky suvis so vedeckym skepticizmom, neviem preco to davas dohromady.

a prestante sa so mnou bavit o povinnosti ockovania! uz som tu tisickrat napisal, ze to mi je ukradnute, ze chcem debatovat iba o samotnej ucinnosti vakcinacie. ffs.

00000101000635390006355601122092066056490660757106607722066077440660781106607864066079190660801006608048066081180660829006608344066087570660885706609148
zayo
 zayo      18.04.2012 - 10:40:07 , level: 2, UP   NEW
podľa tvojej logiky,tam kde je očkovanie nepovinné,je účinnosť menša a tým pádom aj oveľa vyšší výskyt chorôb,proti ktorým sa očkuje.je to tak?

0000010100063539000635560112209206605649066075710660772206607744066078110660786406607919066080100660804806608118066082900660834406608757066088570660914806609279
kamYL
 kamYL      18.04.2012 - 11:29:22 [1K] , level: 3, UP   NEW
Epidemiologie pertuse v ČR a srovnání s ostatními evropskými státy
možno Ti tato prednaska pomoze najst odpoved na tvoju otazku :)

0000010100063539000635560112209206605649066075710660772206607744066078110660786406607919066080100660804806608118066082900660834406608757066088570660914806609225
OsiRi$
 OsiRi$      18.04.2012 - 11:08:49 (modif: 18.04.2012 - 11:11:44), level: 3, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
In certain parts of the US, vaccination rates have dropped so low that occurrences of some children’s diseases are approaching pre-vaccine levels for the first time ever. And the number of people who choose not to vaccinate their children (so-called philosophical exemptions are available in about 20 states, including Pennsylvania, Texas, and much of the West) continues to rise. In states where such opting out is allowed, 2.6 percent of parents did so last year, up from 1 percent in 1991, according to the CDC. In some communities, like California’s affluent Marin County, just north of San Francisco, non-vaccination rates are approaching 6 percent (counterintuitively, higher rates of non-vaccination often correspond with higher levels of education and wealth).

That may not sound like much, but a recent study by the Los Angeles Times indicates that the impact can be devastating. The Times found that even though only about 2 percent of California’s kindergartners are unvaccinated (10,000 kids, or about twice the number as in 1997), they tend to be clustered, disproportionately increasing the risk of an outbreak of such largely eradicated diseases as measles, mumps, and pertussis (whooping cough). The clustering means almost 10 percent of elementary schools statewide may already be at risk.


edit : okrem toho
a prestante sa so mnou bavit o povinnosti ockovania! uz som tu tisickrat napisal, ze to mi je ukradnute, ze chcem debatovat iba o samotnej ucinnosti vakcinacie. ffs.

000001010006353900063556011220920660564906607571066077220660774406607811066078640660791906608010066080480660811806608290066083440660875706608857066091480660922506609320
zayo
 zayo      18.04.2012 - 11:45:20 , level: 4, UP   NEW
mňa napríklad korelácia medzi povinnosťou a účinnosťou v dnešnej dobe zaujímala.dík za článok,ktorý ju potvrdzuje

00000101000635390006355601122092066056490660757106607722066077440660781106607864066079190660801006608048066081180660829006608344066087570660885706609148066092250660932006609427
kamYL
 kamYL      18.04.2012 - 12:34:33 (modif: 18.04.2012 - 12:35:59) [2K] , level: 5, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
clanok nemam, ale pozri si henten clanok vyssie
http://kyberia.sk/id/6609279
strana č.12
Norsko, Svedsko, Finsko su krajiny kde ockovanie proti ciernemu kaslu nie je povinne a je tam vyssia incidencia s porovnanim s napr. Slovenskom a Polskom (kde ockovanie proti pertussi povinne je)

tie cisla som overil
je to prepocitane na 100 000 obyvatelov

0000010100063539000635560112209206605649066075710660772206607744066078110660786406607919066080100660804806608118066082900660834406608757066088570660914806609225066093200660942706609514
zdienka
 zdienka      18.04.2012 - 13:15:31 , level: 6, UP   NEW
pisem ze kazda ma svoje parametre... netvrdim nic o incidencii a nespochybnujem ucinnost ockovania a suvislost s jeho plosnostou... atd.

0000010100063539000635560112209206605649066075710660772206607744066078110660786406607919066080100660804806608118066082900660834406608757066088570660914806609225066093200660942706609508
zayo
 zayo      18.04.2012 - 13:14:10 , level: 6, UP   NEW
hej hej pozeral som aj celú tú prezentáciu,sú tam zaujímavé čísla,thnx

0000010100063539000635560112209206605649066075710660772206607744066078110660786406607919066080100660804806608118066082900660834406608757066088570660914806609210
Thunder Perfect Mind
 Thunder Perfect Mind      18.04.2012 - 11:03:27 , level: 3, UP   NEW
je otazne ci tam kde je ockovanie "nepovinne" je aj mensia zaockovanost, pretoze "nepovinne" ma v roznych krajinach rozne vyznamy.