 |
|
| node: | Re[7]: 04.02.2010-8:15:48 |
| template: | 4 |
| parent: | Re[6]: 04.02.2010-8:15:48 |
| owner: | spectre |
| viewed by: | |
| created: | 05.02.2010 - 14:46:50 |
| updated: | 05.02.2010 - 14:47:47 |
|
cwbe coordinatez: 101 63537 758948 1102981 5166503 5168532 5169399 5169406 5169419 5169484 5169493 5169552 ABSOLUT KYBERIA |
| permissions | |
| you: | r, |
| system: | public |
| net: | yes |
total descendants::4
total children::1
ved netvrdim, ze musi byt s F2,8. pre lowcost canon je to ale imho dobra alternativa.
ako dostupne alternativy ma napadaju
setaky 18-55/3,5-5,6 (IS/VR)
(spolu s canon 500D/nikon D5000)
sigma 17-70/2,8-4,5
mozno seconhand tokina 16-50/2,8
s nikonom (D3000 alebo secondhand D80/D200)
nikkor 18-70/3,5-4,5
nikkor 18-105/3,5-5,6 VR
vsetko ostatne je mimo budgetu 700 eur afaik, vratane nizsie odporucaneho 5D kde by dal tolko len za samotne secondhand telo a na objektiv by mu uz nezostalo.
ako dostupne alternativy ma napadaju
setaky 18-55/3,5-5,6 (IS/VR)
(spolu s canon 500D/nikon D5000)
sigma 17-70/2,8-4,5
mozno seconhand tokina 16-50/2,8
s nikonom (D3000 alebo secondhand D80/D200)
nikkor 18-70/3,5-4,5
nikkor 18-105/3,5-5,6 VR
vsetko ostatne je mimo budgetu 700 eur afaik, vratane nizsie odporucaneho 5D kde by dal tolko len za samotne secondhand telo a na objektiv by mu uz nezostalo.