Re: 04.02.2010-8:15:48 :: Something smarter than us is going to emerge


node:	Re: 04.02.2010-8:15:48
template:	4
parent:	04.02.2010-8:15:48
owner:	g-(ro)man
viewed by:
created:	05.02.2010 - 00:16:54

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63537
758948
1102981
5166503
5168532

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

ked zacinas kup si kludne aj 1000D od canonu, je to v pohode fotak a radsej investuj do lepsieho objektivu, daky na allround, 17-55 2.8f a k tomu pevne sklo, ci uz 50mm alebo 85mm 1.8f...hlavne si neber daky lacny telezoom ako 70-200 4,5-6f od sigmy a spol, su pomale, hrcia a kvalita v ....

I used to be schizophrenic, but we’re OK now

00000101000635370075894801102981051665030516853205169399

no, ale iba objektiv 17-55 f/2.8 bude imho aspon dva krat tych 700 euro...

Prave takyto objektiv by som chcel, ale dat za neho $1400, teda viac ako za samotne telo je mi vela...

0000010100063537007589480110298105166503051685320516939905169972

mas pravdu, som sa trocha sekol :)

I used to be schizophrenic, but we’re OK now

0000010100063537007589480110298105166503051685320516939905169406

tamron 17-50/2,8 stoji okolo 350 eur novy

edit:
Canon 1000D + Tamron 17-50/2,8 722 EUR
http://www.megafoto.sk/Canon/eos-1000d-telo
http://www.megafoto.sk/Tamron/af-sp-17-50-2.8-canon

celkom slusna kombinacia do zaciatku

000001010006353700758948011029810516650305168532051693990516940605169419

ten som mal...nenadchol ma nejako ked mam pravdu povedat

00000101000635370075894801102981051665030516853205169399051694060516941905169509

inac ale suhlasim...to je len taka moja pripovidka k tomu sklu. ostrenie ma nenadchlo, polkilometrova vysuvacia trubicka, slnecna clona nepotesila, chromaticka aberacia dost dost onicom...ale tokina je na tom este horsie.

00000101000635370075894801102981051665030516853205169399051694060516941905169484

poznas za tie peniaze nieco lepsie?

0000010100063537007589480110298105166503051685320516939905169406051694190516948405169493

mozno sa nehnat zakazdym po 2.8 svetelnosti...

000001010006353700758948011029810516650305168532051693990516940605169419051694840516949305169552

ved netvrdim, ze musi byt s F2,8. pre lowcost canon je to ale imho dobra alternativa.

ako dostupne alternativy ma napadaju
setaky 18-55/3,5-5,6 (IS/VR)
(spolu s canon 500D/nikon D5000)
sigma 17-70/2,8-4,5
mozno seconhand tokina 16-50/2,8

s nikonom (D3000 alebo secondhand D80/D200)
nikkor 18-70/3,5-4,5
nikkor 18-105/3,5-5,6 VR

vsetko ostatne je mimo budgetu 700 eur afaik, vratane nizsie odporucaneho 5D kde by dal tolko len za samotne secondhand telo a na objektiv by mu uz nezostalo.

00000101000635370075894801102981051665030516853205169399051694060516941905169484051694930516955205169584

inac sigmu 17-70 vylepsili na 2.8-4 s HSM a stabilizatorom...som zvedavy na cenu.

0000010100063537007589480110298105166503051685320516939905169406051694190516948405169493051695520516958405169684

aj ten tamron je uz vylepseny, tiez so stabilizatorom, ale stale s pomalym ostrenim, stoji nieco cez 400€

000001010006353700758948011029810516650305168532051693990516940605169419051694840516949305169552051695840516968405169902

skor "vylepseny"
The Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF] VC is a very promising lens based on its sheer specifications. However, it falls somewhat short of the high expectations especially when considering the excellent performance of its non-VC variant.
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/482-tamron_1750_28vc_canon?start=2

00000101000635370075894801102981051665030516853205169399051694060516941905169484051694930516955205169584051696840516990205169991

neviem posudit, so starym som nikdy nefotil, novy mam a paci sa mi
podla recenzii sa tento novy sprava lepsie v protisvetle

00000101000635370075894801102981051665030516853205168540

dakujem :)