login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[6]: 01.09.2020-19:52:47
template:
4
parent:
Re[5]: 01.09.2020-19:52:47
owner:
jklmn
viewed by:
created:
03.09.2020 - 09:08:59
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
8333809
8837211
8703087
8781392
8781464
8781612
8781625
8781677
8781681
8781764
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::6
total children::2
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
ale ved ja nikde netvrdim kolko je. co som napisal plati.
title/content
title
content
user
000001010833380908837211087030870878139208781464087816120878162508781677087816810878176408781781
ddd
03.09.2020 - 09:41:28
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re[7]: 01.09.2020-19:52:47
prosim ta, fakt to prehodnot:
1) 'nikde netvrdis' iba to podsuvas ako zdanlivo relevantny a rovnocenny pohlad. takym pohladom to ale nie je, je to nieco, CO ABSOLUTNE NIE JE PRAVDA.
2) prises '[...] AK [to poklesne...], TAK [zomreli...] TO [podla mna trochu UBERA...]'
Ak to 'nikde netvrdis', tak potom by si
i) mal pisat to BY uberalo [... keby to bola pravda.] ale nie je, takze neubera.
ii) ak to 'nikde netvrdis', tak co vlastne cely ten tvoj konstrukt ma znamenat? Lebo ma formu AK nejaka hypoteza, ktora nie je pravdiva, TAK potom by sme z toho mohli nieco vyvodit. Aky ma vyznam taketo nieco pisat, ked ta hypoteza je blud? Ci len sa teoreticky rozpravame a priebehu nejakeho ineho covid-u v alternativnom vesmire?
00000101083338090883721108703087087813920878146408781612087816250878167708781681087817640878178108781948
jklmn
03.09.2020 - 14:23:30
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[8]: 01.09.2020-19:52:47
ii) vysvetloval som, preco sa max.g moze udalost zdat nie az taka vazna.
i) pisem aj "ak to poklesne na 20" tam ti preco nechyba to BY?
interpretujes si co som napisal tak ako si to chces interpretovat.
00000101083338090883721108703087087813920878146408781612087816250878167708781681087817640878178108781784
Thunder Perfect Mind
03.09.2020 - 09:46:40
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[8]: 01.09.2020-19:52:47
ad i) - ani keby to bola pravda by to nesedelo, t.j. aj AK by sa umrtnost "vratila do normalu", neznamena to ze "tak zomreli len ludia, co by v dany rok boli tak ci tak zomreli" - mohla zomriet ina skupina ludi
0000010108333809088372110870308708781392087814640878161208781625087816770878168108781764087817810878178408781798
ddd
03.09.2020 - 10:29:02
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[9]: 01.09.2020-19:52:47
jj jasne, zjavne mam tendenciu neskumat blizsie obsah ked to je cele false implies [...]
Pointa bola, ze struktura toho, co napisal, nesedi s tym 'nikde netvrdim'.
000001010833380908837211087030870878139208781464087816120878162508781677087816810878176408781781087817840878179808781987
jklmn
03.09.2020 - 16:06:34
, level: 4,
UP
NEW
Re[10]: 01.09.2020-19:52:47
chcem sa zlepsit v argumentacii, cize neplati
ak x bude 5, to bude v pohode, oproti scenaru ze x bude 20
ale platilo by
ak by x bolo 5, bolo by to v pohode, oproti scenaru ze by x bolo 20
o to ide?
000001010833380908837211087030870878139208781464087816120878162508781677087816810878176408781766
Thunder Perfect Mind
03.09.2020 - 09:15:42
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re[7]: 01.09.2020-19:52:47
neplati