Re[6]: Bitcoin is failing as a currency :: Something smarter than us is going to emerge


node:	Re[6]: Bitcoin is failing as a currency
template:	4
parent:	Re[5]: Bitcoin is failing as a currency
owner:	niekt0
viewed by:
created:	16.12.2017 - 10:40:02

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63540
63590
5734320
8432068
8432179
8432297
8432486
8432496
8432603
8432617

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

Malo by to fungovat tak, ze si vytvoris "kanal" medzi dvoma nodami, teda obe strany daju nejake mnoztvo btc "do zastavy", a vznikne medzi nimi nieco ako "clearing". Teda transakcie medzi nimi nejdu na blokchain, iba otvorenie a zatvorenie kanalu. (ano, pravdepodobne to povedie k dalsej centralizacii BTC)

000001010006354000063590057343200843206808432179084322970843248608432496084326030843261708432630

cize nebude to off the chain per se. a problem nie je len centralizacia.
https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/mathematical-proof-that-the-lightning-network-cannot-be-a-decentralized-bitcoin-scaling-solution-1b8147650800

00000101000635400006359005734320084320680843217908432297084324860843249608432603084326170843263008432646

nie som si presne isty co myslis tym "chain per se", v LN by malo byt mozne preposlat transakciu cez viacero nod (ak maju medzi sebou tunely), az ku cielovemu prijemcovi. Kedze tento proces by bol mimo blokchain, mohol by byt rychly, a poplatky (v pomere) male.

Ci to bude v praxi naozaj fungovat je stale otazne, ale nejaka beta uz na testnete je, tak uvidime coskoro.

0000010100063540000635900573432008432068084321790843229708432486084324960843260308432617084326300843264608432668

ak to pojde cez viacero nod, tak kazdi dvaja ucastnici takejto retaze musia otvorit a skoncit transakciu. cize pojdu na chain dva krat plus *pocet ucastnikov v retazi. ci?

000001010006354000063590057343200843206808432179084322970843248608432496084326030843261708432630084326460843266808432687

nie, prave ze nemusia, kedze maju medzi sebou otvoreny tunel (aka clearing).