Re[7]: sigma 70-200 f2.8 :: six billion people can be wrong


node:	Re[7]: sigma 70-200 f2.8
template:	4
parent:	Re[6]: sigma 70-200 f2.8
owner:	DrZak
viewed by:
created:	26.07.2016 - 06:59:22

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63537
758948
1102981
8184226
8184504
8184532
8188882
8188929
8189144
8189162
8189304

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

neurons
stats|by_visit|by_K source tiamat K|my_K|given_K last commanders polls
total descendants::2
total children::2
show[ 2 | 3] flat

no, prave ze su naozaj vyrovnane podla reviews co som cital :)

00000101000635370075894801102981081842260818450408184532081888820818892908189144081891620818930408239289

visby 27.10.2016 - 09:37:10 level: 1 UP New
Re[8]: sigma 70-200 f2.8

drzal som v ruke nestabilizovanu verziu canonu, sigmu a tamron a po chvilke bolo jasne:
sigma ma extremne pomale ostrenie, zase cena je super
canon super, tak ako som cca ocakaval
tamron najvacsie prekvapko, imho ostril este rychlejsie ako canon (co je pochopitelne vzhladom na vek).

nehral som sa s nimi dlho, ale co ma trochu zaskocilo je handling, tie skla vazia fakt dost. s tazkym srdcom, ale asi pojdem do f4 od canonu.
00000101000635370075894801102981081842260818450408184532081888820818892908189144081891620818930408189318

visby 26.07.2016 - 07:58:06 (modif: 26.07.2016 - 08:34:27) level: 1 UP New Content changed
Re[8]: sigma 70-200 f2.8

popozeram si reviews, ale stale som skepticky voci 3rd party...

edit: skepticky, pokial cena nie je motivacna;-)