login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[6]: sigma 70-200 f2.8
template:
4
parent:
Re[5]: sigma 70-200 f2.8
owner:
visby
viewed by:
created:
25.07.2016 - 19:21:20
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63537
758948
1102981
8184226
8184504
8184532
8188882
8188929
8189144
8189162
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::3
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
takmer identicke vlastnosti? o tom by som mal pochybnosti, imho canon ostri urcite lepsie...
title/content
title
content
user
000001010006353700758948011029810818422608184504081845320818888208188929081891440818916208189304
DrZak
26.07.2016 - 06:59:22
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re[7]: sigma 70-200 f2.8
no, prave ze su naozaj vyrovnane podla reviews co som cital :)
00000101000635370075894801102981081842260818450408184532081888820818892908189144081891620818930408239289
visby
27.10.2016 - 09:37:10
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[8]: sigma 70-200 f2.8
drzal som v ruke nestabilizovanu verziu canonu, sigmu a tamron a po chvilke bolo jasne:
sigma ma extremne pomale ostrenie, zase cena je super
canon super, tak ako som cca ocakaval
tamron najvacsie prekvapko, imho ostril este rychlejsie ako canon (co je pochopitelne vzhladom na vek).
nehral som sa s nimi dlho, ale co ma trochu zaskocilo je handling, tie skla vazia fakt dost. s tazkym srdcom, ale asi pojdem do f4 od canonu.
00000101000635370075894801102981081842260818450408184532081888820818892908189144081891620818930408189318
visby
26.07.2016 - 07:58:06
(modif: 26.07.2016 - 08:34:27), level: 2,
UP
NEW
!!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Re[8]: sigma 70-200 f2.8
popozeram si reviews, ale stale som skepticky voci 3rd party...
edit: skepticky, pokial cena nie je motivacna;-)