cwbe coordinatez:
101
63539
4879893
7639798
7640038

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::17
total children::3
5 ❤️


show[ 2 | 3] flat


som akurat vcera pozeral film Children of Hiroshima (1952)
a som sa potom na wiki dozvedel, ze hiroshima a nagasaki boli sice atomove bomby, ale ze viac skody na zivotoch pocas druhej svetovej spravilo jedno bombardovanie mesta napalmom

"During November 1944 American B-29s began their first incendiary bomb raids on Tokyo, and on 9 March 1945, wave upon wave dropped masses of small incendiaries containing an early version of napalm on the city's population—for they directed this assault against civilians. Soon small fires spread, connected, grew into a vast firestorm that sucked the oxygen out of the lower atmosphere. The bomb raid was a 'success' for the Americans; they killed 125,000 Japanese in one attack. The Allies bombed Hamburg and Dresden in the same manner, and Nagoya, Osaka, Kobe, and Tokyo again on May 24. The basic moral decision that the Americans had to make during the war was whether or not they would violate international law by indiscriminately attacking and destroying civilians, and they resolved that dilemma within the context of conventional weapons. Neither fanfare nor hesitation accompanied their choice, and in fact the atomic bomb used against Hiroshima was less lethal than massive fire bombing. The war had so brutalized the American leaders that burning vast numbers of civilians no longer posed a real predicament by the spring of 1945. Given the anticipated power of the atomic bomb, which was far less than that of fire bombing, no one expected small quantities of it to end the war. Only its technique was novel—nothing more."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate_over_the_atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki#A_continuation_of_previous_behaviour




  • 000001010006353904879893076397980764003807641026
    polar 09.07.2014 - 00:14:47 level: 1 UP New
    a este viac sa ludi zomrelo strelnymi zbranami, a este viac chorobami - to este neznamena, ze atomova bomba nie je tisice krat efektivnejsia nez napalmova, alebo ze to nie je najhrozostrasnejsia zbran ktora bola kedy pouzita
    more children: (1)
  • 000001010006353904879893076397980764003807640707
    visby 08.07.2014 - 18:08:47 level: 1 UP New
    ono to nie je az take jednoduche podla mna, hiroshima a nagasaki mali velky psychologicky efekt, kvoli tomu ze to boli len dve bomby, dve lietadla a nie niekolko desiatok(stoviek?) lietadiel.
    more children: (1)
  • 000001010006353904879893076397980764003807640706
    roger 08.07.2014 - 18:06:29 (modif: 08.07.2014 - 22:25:43) level: 1 UP New Content changed
    bombardovanie civilistov zacalo uz v 43om v nemecku (tie legendarne firestormy hamburg a drazdany).

    vojensky je rozdiel v efektivite a priprave. na tokyo letelo skoro 300 lietadiel (10% straty).


    e: kobercove nalety v europe bezne pozostavali z tisicky (!) lietadiel.

    netreba podcenovat ani vplyv obrovskeho bluffu americanov - oni ziadne dalsie funkcne bomby nemali. a nemali ich ani niekolko rokov po vojne. japonci to zozrali ako turci kolac

    Stalin mal ale dokonaly prehlad, vedel o bombach uz na Jalte, a poznal situaciu aj po vojne a preto nefungovalo zastrasovanie pri blokade Berlina.
    more children: (2)