Re[7]: do ohnicka prilejeme 2dc oleja :D :: Something smarter than us is going to emerge


node:	Re[7]: do ohnicka prilejeme 2dc oleja :D
template:	4
parent:	Re[6]: do ohnicka prilejeme 2dc oleja :D
owner:	ritomak
viewed by:
created:	03.03.2013 - 16:56:46
updated:	03.03.2013 - 16:57:18

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63539
4879893
7075298
7078988
7079042
7079052
7079062
7079082
7079100
7079125

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

ok, tak by sme sa mohli zhodnut na tomto: "homeopatia moze byt ucinna do tej miery, do akej miery moze byt ucinne placebo".

tym padom sa cela debata presunie na otazku: "do akej miery a ci vobec funguje placebo efekt."

neodvazujem sa robit arbitra, faktom vsak je, ze som sa stretol s viacerymi vedeckymi studiami, ktore sa zoberali placebo efektom. porovnavat ich vypovednu hodnotu s vypovednou hodnotou tebou linkovanej studie si vsak netrufam.

viem vsak co v medicinskej brandzi znamena casopis Lancet ("The Lancet is a weekly peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is one of the world's best known, oldest, and most respected general medical journals.") a predpokladam, ze by v tomto casopise neuverejnovali vyslovene hluposti:
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673609617062/abstract?_eventId=login&rss=yes

000001010006353904879893070752980707898807079042070790520707906207079082070791000707912507081446

"homeopatia moze byt ucinna do tej miery, do akej miery moze byt ucinne placebo"
Ale este musime doplnit: pri vedeckych studiach. V beznej praxi nema laik ani lekar luxus kontrolnej skupiny a nema takmer ziadnu moznost posudit, ci ku zmene zdravotneho stavu doslo vdaka (alebo napriek) jeho intervencii alebo z inych dovodov. To je problem prave pri takychto metodach (ak mas bakterialnu infekciu, pravdepodobnost uspesneho vyliecenia konkretnej infekcie konkretnym antibiotikom je vyrazne vyssia ako pravdepodobnost spontanneho vyliecenia a uspesne sa vyliecis, tak to s velkou pravdepodobnosotu mozes pripisat antibiotiku bez inych znalosti. ak to iste "liecis" homeopatikom s nulovou pravdepodobnostou vyliecenia infekcie vdaka "lieku" a vyliecis sa, tak to homeopatiku pripisat nemozes, ale bezny clovek ma velku tendenciu prave toto spravit)

000001010006353904879893070752980707898807079042070790520707906207079082070791000707912507079325

Ty mas zaplateny pristup, alebo len vychadzas z toho, co je uvedene v Summary ?

00000101000635390487989307075298070789880707904207079052070790620707908207079100070791250707932507079391

Clanok je dostupny z inych zdrojov a nie je tam nic prevratne

0000010100063539048798930707529807078988070790420707905207079062070790820707910007079125070793250707939107079404

Laboratory evidence supports the existence of several placebo mechanisms and placebo effects in both healthy volunteers and patients with a variety of medical conditions. Furthermore, clinically relevant evidence shows that placebo effects can have meaningful therapeutic effects, because of their long magnitude and duration, in different patient populations. Although substantial progress has been made in understanding placebo effects, much laboratory and translational clinical trial research remains to be done, with the ultimate aim of harnessing placebo effects to improve patient care.
http://www.fisica.uh.cu/rationalis/etica-placebo/Lancet2010/Lancet2010.pdf

000001010006353904879893070752980707898807079042070790520707906207079082070791000707912507079325070793910707940407079416

ja som to cital, nemusis citovat. Stale je to hlavne o bolesti a subjektivnom vnimani zdravotneho stavu, preto pisem ze nic prevratne, ale aspon tam nacali otazku etiky.