vrsis jednu logical fallacy na druhu (vsetci vieme, ze...) vedeckym studiam sa jednotlivo neda absolutne verit, ale konsenzus vo vedeckej obci je taky, ze vakciny su velmi ucinne.
okrem toho, asi nevies, ako presne funguje veda. doporucujem zacat tu http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

ad "zarucene nezavisle protichodne zavery". kludne postni linky na tie studie, pozrieme sa na to. alebo to budu nejake clanky z bulvaru? tie, co sa zacinaju palcovymi titulkami ze "AMERICKI VEDCI DOKAZALI, ZE CUMENIM NA CICKY SI PREDLZIME ZIVOT!!!", "POCHADZAME Z DAZDOVKY?" alebo "HITLER POTOPIL TITANIC!"?

na tom, co si pisal o tych "hysteriach" vidno, ze sa problematike nerozumies. ked sa objavi potencialne velmi nebezpecna choroba, "hysteria" sa musi spravit, lebo to je jediny cas, ked vies nejak ovplyvnit epidemiu. ked to uz raz vypukne, tak si mozes akurat zalozit ruky a divat sa.

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

There is increasing concern that in modern research, false findings may be the majority or even the vast majority of published research claims. However, this should not be surprising.
...
Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias.