Re[16]: 02.10.2011-14:27:29 :: Something smarter than us is going to emerge


node:	Re[16]: 02.10.2011-14:27:29
template:	4
parent:	Re[15]: 02.10.2011-14:27:29
owner:	..............
viewed by:
created:	14.10.2011 - 14:59:25

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63529
63883
6248511
6248621
6248809
6248926
6248992
6262378
6262783
6263145
6263611
6264556
6264680
6267348
6267909
6270376
6270736
6273583
6273663

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

ok ja ti poviem na co je ta dan. na to, aby bola drahsia energia pre ludi, aby sa mohli pomocou regulacii nicit small bussinesses, aby sa mohla autorizovat globalna zelena policia, zatvarat elektrarne. nechapes, ze je to urcene LEN na znicenie obyvatelstva, ziadna zachrana ziv. prostredia!!! myslis,ze kde tie peniaze koncia a ako sa s nimi manipuluje??? (spomen si na "kauzu emisie")

tato dan ma jedine poslanie. znicit nas. o zivotne prostredie nikdy neslo.
toto si pozri pls http://youtu.be/8jMg4xzJEgk a snad pochopis o com ja hovorim!

000001010006352900063883062485110624862106248809062489260624899206262378062627830626314506263611062645560626468006267348062679090627037606270736062735830627366306293752

Aktualne http://www.economist.com/node/21533360

FOR those who question whether global warming is really happening, it is necessary to believe that the instrumental temperature record is wrong. That is a bit easier than you might think.

000001010006352900063883062485110624862106248809062489260624899206262378062627830626314506263611062645560626468006267348062679090627037606270736062735830627366306277161

ja chapem o com hovoris. ani netvrdim, ze nemas kus pravdy, ale prilis generalizujes. Hoax je trochu prisilne slovo a skutocnost je omnoho komplikovanejsia...