login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[2]: 04.02.2010-8:15:48
template:
4
parent:
Re: 04.02.2010-8:15:48
owner:
M@rtin
viewed by:
created:
05.02.2010 - 13:51:38
updated:
19.02.2010 - 00:58:45
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63537
758948
1102981
5166503
5168532
5169399
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
⠪
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::11
total children::2
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
no, ale iba objektiv 17-55 f/2.8 bude imho aspon dva krat tych 700 euro...
Prave takyto objektiv by som chcel, ale dat za neho $1400, teda viac ako za samotne telo je mi vela...
title/content
title
content
user
0000010100063537007589480110298105166503051685320516939905169972
g-(ro)man
05.02.2010 - 18:00:02
level: 1
UP
New
Re[3]: 04.02.2010-8:15:48
mas pravdu, som sa trocha sekol :)
I used to be schizophrenic, but we’re OK now
0000010100063537007589480110298105166503051685320516939905169406
spectre
05.02.2010 - 13:54:27
(modif: 05.02.2010 - 14:04:47)
level: 1
UP
New
Content changed
Re[3]: 04.02.2010-8:15:48
tamron 17-50/2,8 stoji okolo 350 eur novy
edit:
Canon 1000D + Tamron 17-50/2,8 722 EUR
http://www.megafoto.sk/Canon/eos-1000d-telo
http://www.megafoto.sk/Tamron/af-sp-17-50-2.8-canon
celkom slusna kombinacia do zaciatku
more children: (1)