login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[3]: 10x50
template:
4
parent:
Re[2]: 10x50
owner:
cyboff
viewed by:
created:
01.08.2007 - 09:04:45
updated:
01.08.2007 - 09:05:46
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63533
1491152
63777
3284416
3285697
3285715
3285756
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::
total children::2
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
no s 10x50 uvidis uz z principu o neco mene hvezd (myslim jako podle magnitudy, ne zorneho pole) prze 7x50 propusti vice svetla...
a to fakt resis az takovy superkvalitni dalekohled? ;]
title/content
title
content
user
000001010006353301491152000637770328441603285697032857150328575603285906
borg
01.08.2007 - 10:29:17
level: 1
UP
New
Re[4]: 10x50
s tym nesuhlasim, oba dalekohlady prepustia rovnako vela svetla. to zavisi od priemeru objektivu, nie zvacsenia. 10x50 moze mat mensiu svetelnost ako 7x50, ale to na vizualne pozorovanie nema ziadny vplyv, len na astrofoto. ja by som siel radsej do 10x50 ako 7x50.
more children: (1)
000001010006353301491152000637770328441603285697032857150328575603285778
xado
01.08.2007 - 09:19:09
level: 1
UP
New
Re[4]: 10x50
aaale trt - superlevny riesim ;)
more children: (1)