Re[14]: 18.06.2007-20:28:43 :: Remember, remember, the velvet November


node:	Re[14]: 18.06.2007-20:28:43
template:	4
parent:	Re[13]: 18.06.2007-20:28:43
owner:	mtk
viewed by:
created:	04.07.2007 - 12:21:54

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63529
1516524
3194999
3195189
3195229
3196079
3197666
3197685
3198752
3207307
3208609
3209140
3221303
3222207
3227788
3228153
3228173

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

jak mozes ty take neco posudzovat?

00000101000635290151652403194999031951890319522903196079031976660319768503198752032073070320860903209140032213030322220703227788032281530322817303228432

Lebo karma podla mna neznamena pri autonehode stat a myknut plecom, ze ved karma.

Aby som len tak netlachal: "The emphasis of karma in Buddhism is on mindful action, not on blaming someone for whatever happens to them.", tiez: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma_in_Buddhism#Wrong_Understandings_of_Karma , kde sa pise, ze je nespravne Karmu chapat ako "Pubbekatahetuvada: The belief that all happiness and suffering arise from previous karma (Past-action determinism)."

Preto si myslim, ze 'nedalo sa tomu vyhnut', je nespravne pocopenie karmy. Budhisticky mnich by ti pomohol vstat, neskumal by dovody tvojho padu.

Este ma napadlo ze mozno mala na mysli nejaku inu vieru v Karmu, v tom pripade, je ale ta 'Karma' deterministicka a vedie k fatalizmu a pasivite.

0000010100063529015165240319499903195189031952290319607903197666031976850319875203207307032086090320914003221303032222070322778803228153032281730322843203230557

ok, imho to znamena
po akejkolvek nehode
stat (ak sa teda da)
uff, karma (no jasne)
ja blbec
musim na to inak
skusim troche vedomejsie konat...

0000010100063529015165240319499903195189031952290319607903197666031976850319875203207307032086090320914003221303032222070322778803228153032281730322843203228913

ale ja mam z tvojich reakcii pocit, ze si odporujes.....

ak teda pouzivame wikipediu
kukni sem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma
(to ze buddhisti su viac fajn, neznamena, ze ich karma je ta prava ;)))

na jednej strane totok tutok
a na druhej strane sa pytas co kajco spravil, ze sa mu to stalo?ano je to cast karmy, cokolvek
dolezita cast ale je, ze ty rozhodujes o svojej karme

toto cele je o karme v budhistickom kontexte,
takisto ako to co si ty vyssie vytrhol z kontextu
(imho nemozem vytrhnut cast o nespravnom pochopeni karmy - musis vysvetlit aj to spravne)
btw.

THE FOUR LAWS OF KARMA
1. Results are similar to the cause. Simply said, when I cause other people harm, I will harvest suffering myself. It is important to note here, that "positive" actions are defined as actions that have happiness as a result; "negative" actions are defined as actions that lead to suffering as a result.
2. No results without a cause. As is obvious within science, things do not just appear out of nothing.
3. Once an action is done, the result is never lost. Similarly as above, things do not just disappear into nothing.
4. Karma expands. Once we have an imprint of an action in our mind, it tends to be habit-forming. As is often said in wars for example, killing the first enemy is tough, but after a handful, one quickly loses count and it becomes "normal". Also psychology often stresses a similar point when e.g. explaining actions of adults from their childhood experiences.

WHAT IS NEEDED FOR KARMA TO RIPEN?

1. A previous action, or karmic potential.
2. Conditions: the circumstances must be available before I can undergo a specific result.
3. A deluded mind. Without delusions in our mind, we will never experience the results of previous actions. This happens to Arhats and Buddhas; their minds have been purified from delusions, and they are beyond the realm of karma.

http://buddhism.kalachakranet.org/karma.html#1
velmi pekne tutok