cwbe coordinatez:
866
1551575
2834359
2910755

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::
total children::2
2 ❤️


show[ 2 | 3] flat




Web 2.0’s democratisation of media produces a wealth of new perspectives. Some of those formerly excluded from the public sphere have the chance to make their voices heard. But this wave of participation is as important for business as it is for the newly included. Mute's Web 2.0 special uncovers the work in social networking and, behind the 'dotcommunist' spin, a centralisation of the means of sharing. Texts by Giorgio Agostoni, Olga Goriunova, Dmytri Kleiner & Brian Wyrick and Angela Mitropoulos. Additional articles by Brian Ashton, John Barker, Paul Helliwell and Merijn Oudenampsen
Contents of this cluster

1. Editorial
2. InfoEnclosure 2.0
3. The Social SoftWar
4. The Long Tale
5. Swarm Forms: On Platforms and Creativity
6. The Factory Without Walls
7. First Cut is the Deepest
8. Extreme Makeover
9. Reader Flattery – Iain Sinclair and the Colonisation of East London

plná verzia online:
http://www.metamute.org/en/Web-2.0-Mans-best-friendster




0000086601551575028343590291075502913594
rot
 rot      06.02.2007 - 13:51:06 (modif: 06.02.2007 - 13:59:40), level: 1, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
btw, pripadni zaujemcovia najdu par cisiel casopisu Mute v bratislavskom infoshope.

0000086601551575028343590291075502913044
muna
 muna      06.02.2007 - 10:31:21 , level: 1, UP   NEW
co by v tomto kontexte mohlo znamenat "centralisation of the means of sharing"?
ze je par velkych stranok/sluzieb, ktore pouzivaju vsetci - a ktore niekto vlastni - ma tam akcie? aleboze ze vsetko skupi google a pod.?

000008660155157502834359029107550291304402913566
rot
 rot      06.02.2007 - 13:39:44 , level: 2, UP   NEW
myslim, ze ide o to, ze sluzby ako youtube (digg, flickr, ...) vytlacaju peer-to-peer zdielanie a nahradzaju ho vlastnym centralistickym modelom, v ktorom je vsetko sustredene v jednom velkom datacentre (v protiklade k "tekutemu" datacentru pri p2p zdielani).

dost ma zaujala poznamka v jednom z clankov o prechode od synchronneho k asynchronnemu pripojeniu na internet - ze dial-up pripojenie modemom umoznovalo napr. 3.5kBps download i upload, zatial co napr. moje sucasne pripojenie cez kabel je 120kBps download, ale len 14kBps upload. to nas (ludi so slabsim pripojenim) v podstate "nuti" pouzivat centralisticky model.

00000866015515750283435902910755029130440291356602913978
muna
 muna      06.02.2007 - 17:24:33 , level: 3, UP   NEW
hm, to by asi sedelo.
otazka je, do akej miery tieto "technicke" parametre vedu ludi k pouzivaniu tohto centralistickeho modelu namiesto p2p?
ja myslim, ze je to dost aj o pohodlnosti uzivatela a o promo. o tom, ze p2p siete su predsa len specializovane - v zmysle, ze napr. generacii mojich rodicov zostava tato oblast v podstate neznama, kdezto s napr. Youtube sa uz urcite stretli. nabaluje sa to - cim viac pouzivatelov centralistickeho modelu, tim rychlejsie pribudaju dalsi..

0000086601551575028343590291075502913044029135660291397802914033
rot
 rot      06.02.2007 - 17:47:20 , level: 4, UP   NEW
jasne, suvisi to aj s pouzitelnostou. uz len embedding videa do okna browseru je pomerne zlozita zalezitost, a sluzby ako youtube to urobia za uzivatela... ale za istu cenu.