cwbe coordinatez:
101
63539
63556
63998
2051703

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::
total children::3
15 ❤️


show[ 2 | 3] flat


svet0
squartefaghoui0
ketsl0
kata mach0
zona central...0
cubby0
mrjn0
Trilobite0
niko1
Jay2
Years of observing the behavior of highly intelligent people has led me to develop the following list of seven mistakes, which only very intelligent and/or very educated people are guilty of:

1, Hardness of listening: The more intelligent you are, the more likely it is that you will not hear most of what other people are saying. The operative theory here seems to be "I already know what you are going to say, so I don't need to actually hear you say it before I disagree with you." To paraphrase an old-time program, I believe that "I can name that thought" after hearing three words or less of what you have to say.

2, Mental telepathy: Intelligent people are so used to talking to themselves that they often forget to actually say their part of conversation out loud. Later on, of course, they distinctly remember expressing an idea, but they have forgotten that they only thought of saying it to the other person. This leads to many interesting "instant replays" of imaginary conversations, since this type of person can always recall the exact words, not only of what they said, but especially of what they intended to say.

3, Verbal paranoia: This disease is characterized by feeling persecuted whenever someone disagrees with you. Since it is obvious that you are so smart, the thinking goes, no reasonable person could disagree with you unless they were deliberately and maliciously trying to get you angry and hurt your feelings. This habit becomes especially interesting when two highly intelligent people are arguing, since both feel that the other person should bow o their (obviously superior) intelligence.

4, Rampant cross-confidence: This is the automatic assumption that expertise in one field automatically makes you an expert in any other subject that comes up in a conversation. This habit can also take a form of asserting that education is not really necessary, since "any intelligent person" can understand anything instantly, if they just put their mind into it. I once heard a Mensa member state categorically that he could become an expert in atomic physics just by reading a couple of books, and the only reason he knew nothing about the subject was that he didn't happen to have the time to spare just then.

5, Omnilogomania: This severe malady begins with a wide-ranging interest and curiosity about everything, but turns into the idea that a really intelligent person should know all there is to know about everything. The result is a person who runs off in all directions, with no depth of knowledge in any one area. There is a lot to be said about for using your intelligence to become an expert in something, letting that one thing to be the focal point for investigating other fields. Besides, nobody is going to pay you very much for knowing a little bit about a lot of things. Or, as David's Law No. 1 states, you can do anything, you put your mind to, but you can't do everything you put your mind to.

6, Boundary-blundering: It seems that the smarter you are, the harder it is for you to remember where the boundaries are between mental and physical reality, for instance, or between imaginary and real universes. For this type of person, mathematics or social science may become more absorbing than the real world of human emotions, or conversely, the highly intelligent person might be more prone to be caught up in the grip of powerful stories, myths or complicated belief systems. For instance, every educated person knows that there are an infinite number of points on any line segment, but how many of these same people are really clear on the fact that there are no points at all on the physical representation of a line? *

7, Superior survivorship: This is the conviction that intelligence is a survival factor for human beings. Actually, intelligence may even be counterproductive for survival. Most of the time, conformity is much more useful for bonding people to a group, and groups are the highest need for survival. Most behavior that seems unintelligent to an outsider makes perfect sense to those inside group. As one anthropologist puts it, stupidity might just be more important for survival than intelligence, as long as nothing new comes along to upset the status quo. Intelligence is sort of held in reserve for very unusual times; in the meantime, you can always use it to have a lot of fun in your life, or to make up terrible puns.


From the April 1997 issue of Grafitti, the newsletter of Cleveland area Mensa, Mary Ann Terrigno, Editor.



* (typist note: lost in translation - I don't get the point of this example - could somebody explain?)




000001010006353900063556000639980205170304350242
grurbangi
 grurbangi      09.12.2008 - 18:19:43 , level: 1, UP   NEW
too long way to die.

000001010006353900063556000639980205170303331171
squartefaghoui
 squartefaghoui      26.08.2007 - 11:50:59 , level: 1, UP   NEW
there are an infinite number of points on any line segment, but how many of these same people are really clear on the fact that there are no points at all on the physical representation of a line?
Mas usecku, ktora ma jasne zadefinovane, kde zacina a konci. Usecka je subor za sebou iducich bodov, ktore maju presny pocet a preto usecku ohranicuju (a mozme ju napr. odmerat)
avsak, problem nastava v dvoch pripadoch:
'nikto ti nepovie, aky velky je jeden bod a kolko bodov tu usecku vlastne vytvara. jedine, co kazdy vie na isto je, ze ich pocet je presne ohraniceny (kedze ta usecka niekde konci)
'druhy pripad logicky vychadza z prveho: kedze nevies, ake velke a kolko bodov na nej je, ergo nemozes tvrdit, ze tam nejake su, lebo ich nevidis (to je ta fyzikalna reprezentacia)
preto vytvaras dve protikladne tvrdenie, pricom kazde je spravne (to, ak sa nemylim, sa vola axiom)

mozno sa mylim, ale aspon ja som to tak pochopil

\"Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand.\"

nenavist je dvojsecna zbran

00000101000635390006355600063998020517030333117103335262
dark matter
 dark matter      29.08.2007 - 00:45:18 , level: 2, UP   NEW
stenlis to myslim vysvetlil spravne
tak ako na mape slnka nikdy nebude prebiehat termonukleana reakcia, tak ani ked na papier nakreslis ciaru, nebude to usecka zlozena z bezozmenrych bodov ako je to povedane v matematickej definicii usecky

bod je matematicky konstrukt nezobrazitelny v realnom svete

mimochodm, kazda usecka sa sklada z nekonecneho poctu bodov a jej dlzka sa neodvodzuje od poctu bodov, ale od vzdialenosi tych dvoch krajnych

00000101000635390006355600063998020517030333117103331318
stenlis
 stenlis      26.08.2007 - 13:05:10 , level: 2, UP   NEW
je to trochu inak

v prvom rade - matematika pracuje nasledovnym sposobom - najprv si zadefinujes nejake prvky tym ze im das nejake vlastnosti, potom si zadefinujes nejake zakladne vztahy medzi tymito prvkami a potom sa snazis objavit dalsie vztahy a vlastnosti prvkov, ktore vyplyvaju z toho co si zadefinoval

Bod je zadefinovany a z definicie je bezrozmerny. Bod nemozno v realnom svete reprezentovat, pretoze v realnom svete nic nie je bezrozmerne. V realnom svete nemozno odmerat usecku, nemozno ju ani len nakreslit. Ked si zoberies ceruzku a pravitko a nakreslis na papier ciaru, moze sa ti zdat, ze to je usecka, ale to je len klam. Usecka je zadefinovana ako neprerusena postupnost bodov, zatial co ta ciara na papieri je prerusovana - atomy uhlika z tuhy su viazane na molekuly papiera a tie medzi sebou udrzuju urcite vzdialenosti.

Matematika nie je realna vec - je to myslienkovy konstrukt, ktory nema v nasom vesmire ekvivalent, len aproximaciu. Teda aspon co sa tyka spojitych entit - scitavat hrusky a jablka sa da presne...

0000010100063539000635560006399802051703033311710333131803331706
squartefaghoui
 squartefaghoui      26.08.2007 - 18:22:36 , level: 3, UP   NEW
a ked ich vynasobis?

\"Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand.\"

nenavist je dvojsecna zbran

000001010006353900063556000639980205170303331171033313180333170603332173
stenlis
 stenlis      27.08.2007 - 03:42:21 , level: 4, UP   NEW
to nerob

mohol by si poskodit podstatu reality

000001010006353900063556000639980205170302053306
niko
 niko      27.12.2005 - 09:36:32 , level: 1, UP   NEW
velmi dobre. velmi sa mi to pacilo, niektore z tych veci poznam... je dobre to zadefinovat, ale je tazke naucit sa proti tomu bojovat.

00000101000635390006355600063998020517030205330602054300
sandozz
 sandozz      27.12.2005 - 19:05:03 , level: 2, UP   NEW
proti inteligencii, alebo proti comu vlastne? ;) (len prosim ziadnu verbalnu paranoiu:)

0000010100063539000635560006399802051703020533060205430002057131
niko
 niko      29.12.2005 - 12:17:18 , level: 3, UP   NEW
proti ty bad habits...