Re[6]: Characterizing Delusional Spirals through Human-LLM Chat Logs


node:	Re[6]: Characterizing Delusional Spirals through Human-LLM Chat Logs
template:	4
parent:	Re[5]: Characterizing Delusional Spirals through Human-LLM Chat Logs
owner:	aarin
viewed by:
created:	23.03.2026 - 09:14:28
updated:	23.03.2026 - 09:18:33

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63540
8514408
9304537
9304582
9304588
9304605
9304619
9304630
9304773

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

k sparks of agi sa hodi doplnit embers of autoregression ako counterpoint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13638

edit:
pnas link na embers clanok: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2322420121
sparks clanok nebol publikovany v nicom kde by sa na to niekto musel kriticky pozriet 🤷

0000010100063540085144080930453709304582093045880930460509304619093046300930477309304805

hej no, to máš podobné ako tieto dva uhly pohladu:

THE 2028 GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE CRISIS
Citrini Research
https://kyberia.sk/id/9297544

oproti:
THE 2028 GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE BOOM
Michael Bloch
https://kyberia.sk/id/9303521

000001010006354008514408093045370930458209304588093046050930461909304630093047730930480509304810

mne sa z tohto vlakna tu zda, ze si si vybral take zdroje, ktore podporuju tvoj nazor.

According to Weinberg's principle of complementarity (1975, 120): "Any two points of view are complementary." No one point of view provides the entire understanding. Sometimes different points of view are contradictory - that is just the nature of the world. Paradoxes will arise and may be resolved, but there will always be multiple points of view. Two good examples are the wave/particle duality of light (photons; see chap. 13) and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (measurements of one aspect of a system interfere with knowledge of other aspects). In the context of dynamical systems theory, Weinberg's principle reminds us that, having had to simplify, to adopt a point of view, and to accept some uncertainty about a system's behavior, we can take other points of view that, provided they are of equal rigor and depth, will undoubtedly contribute different elements to our understanding of the system we are studying. This is not a license to abandon scienti®c rigor and speculate wildly, but simply a reminder that sometimes, as in the wave/particle duality of light, complementary points of view can all be useful, even though each is incomplete.

z Ward: Dynamical Cognitive Science

00000101000635400851440809304537093045820930458809304605093046190930463009304773093048050930481009304864

aj toto:

"Většinou se nejedná o kritiku; rozhodne to není spúsob, jak říci, že vpravo i vlevo se všichni mýlí. Je to spúsob jak definovat singulární místo pomocí exteriority jeho okolí; je to pokus definovat onen prázdný prostor, odkud mluvím, a který se pomalu formuje v diskurzu, který ješte pociťuji jako velice křehký, velice neistý - a nikoli snaha umlčet ostatní tvrzením, že to, co říkají, je bezpředmenté."
Michael Foucault

00000101000635400851440809304537093045820930458809304605093046190930463009304773093048050930481009304827

ako, áno, súhlasím s tým citátom vyššie, a zároveň že to platí na akúkolvek debatu :D,
jednoznačne používam výsek poznania, ktorý som objavil "doteraz" :D. a je to nekonečný fraktál to poznanie, lebo stále širší kontextuálny rámec vnímaš, čiže nekonečné skúmanie, nekonečný popis, pretože nekonečná komplexita tej "siete života" :D. amen :D

https://mudwtr.com/blogs/trends-with-benefits/what-is-mycelium-the-story-of-the-mycelial-network