 |
|
| node: | Re[8]: Characterizing Delusional Spirals through Human-LLM Chat Logs |
| template: | 4 |
| parent: | Re[7]: Characterizing Delusional Spirals through Human-LLM Chat Logs |
| owner: | aarin |
| viewed by: | |
| created: | 23.03.2026 - 11:47:01 |
|
cwbe coordinatez: 101 63540 8514408 9304537 9304582 9304588 9304605 9304619 9304630 9304773 9304805 9304810 ABSOLUT KYBERIA |
| permissions | |
| you: | r, |
| system: | public |
| net: | yes |
total descendants::2
total children::2
1 ❤️
mne sa z tohto vlakna tu zda, ze si si vybral take zdroje, ktore podporuju tvoj nazor.
According to Weinberg's principle of complementarity (1975, 120): "Any two points of view are complementary." No one point of view provides the entire understanding. Sometimes different points of view are contradictory - that is just the nature of the world. Paradoxes will arise and may be resolved, but there will always be multiple points of view. Two good examples are the wave/particle duality of light (photons; see chap. 13) and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (measurements of one aspect of a system interfere with knowledge of other aspects). In the context of dynamical systems theory, Weinberg's principle reminds us that, having had to simplify, to adopt a point of view, and to accept some uncertainty about a system's behavior, we can take other points of view that, provided they are of equal rigor and depth, will undoubtedly contribute different elements to our understanding of the system we are studying. This is not a license to abandon scienti®c rigor and speculate wildly, but simply a reminder that sometimes, as in the wave/particle duality of light, complementary points of view can all be useful, even though each is incomplete.
z Ward: Dynamical Cognitive Science
According to Weinberg's principle of complementarity (1975, 120): "Any two points of view are complementary." No one point of view provides the entire understanding. Sometimes different points of view are contradictory - that is just the nature of the world. Paradoxes will arise and may be resolved, but there will always be multiple points of view. Two good examples are the wave/particle duality of light (photons; see chap. 13) and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (measurements of one aspect of a system interfere with knowledge of other aspects). In the context of dynamical systems theory, Weinberg's principle reminds us that, having had to simplify, to adopt a point of view, and to accept some uncertainty about a system's behavior, we can take other points of view that, provided they are of equal rigor and depth, will undoubtedly contribute different elements to our understanding of the system we are studying. This is not a license to abandon scienti®c rigor and speculate wildly, but simply a reminder that sometimes, as in the wave/particle duality of light, complementary points of view can all be useful, even though each is incomplete.
z Ward: Dynamical Cognitive Science