cwbe coordinatez:
101
63539
4879893
9249124
9249186
9249368

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::3
total children::2
show[ 2 | 3] flat


Na facebooku, asi v niektorej z desiatok feministických skupín a autoriek, ktoré sledujem.

Ako som to ja pochopila, cieľom malo byť to, že siroty, ktoré nezažijú rodinnú lásku, môžu nájsť homosexuálnu lásku u fosterparenta a je im to benefitom do života. To bol ale súkromný cieľ toho vedca, podľa mňa nie ten cieľ, čo bol prezentovaný štátu. Štát asi netušil, že tí foster parents sú pedofily.




00000101000635390487989309249124092491860924936809249385
Rhoda
 Rhoda      16.06.2025 - 20:45:28 , level: 1, UP   NEW
Ja som to pochopila tak, ze to nebol sukromny ciel, ale normalne tak to bolo odsuhlasene:

Kentler befriended a thirteen-year-old named Ulrich, whom he described as “one of the most sought-after prostitutes in the station scene.” When Kentler asked Ulrich where he wanted to stay at night, Ulrich told him about a man he called Mother Winter, who fed boys from the Zoo Station and did their laundry. In exchange, they slept with him. “I said to myself: if the prostitutes call this man ‘mother,’ he can’t be bad,” Kentler wrote. Later, he noted that “Ulrich’s advantage was that he was handsome and that he enjoyed sex; so he could give something back to pedophile men who looked after him.”
Kentler formalized Ulrich’s arrangement. “I managed to get the Senate officer responsible to approve it,” he wrote in “Borrowed Fathers, Children Need Fathers.”

For much of his career, Kentler spoke of pedophiles as benefactors. They offered neglected children “a possibility of therapy,” he told Der Spiegel, in 1980. When the Berlin Senate commissioned him to prepare an expert report on the subject of “Homosexuals as caregivers and educators,” in 1988, he explained that there was no need to worry that children would be harmed by sexual contact with caretakers, as long as the interaction was not “forced.”

0000010100063539048798930924912409249186092493680924938509249472
svetielko
 svetielko      17.06.2025 - 10:43:41 , level: 2, UP   NEW
Áno, mňa na tom článku veľmi veľmi disturbovalo, že tam nebolo explicitne povedané, čo to teda ten štát schválil a ako robil monitoring, aké boli výstupy, atď.
Síce dokumenty boli stratené, ale niekto by to mohol fyzicky vedieť. Lenže to by vyžadovalo obrovskú prácu to zistiť. Ale čakala by som, že keď to nezistili, tak to tam bude nie náznakmi, ale proste naplno povedané:

"Schválili zámerné umiestňovanie detí k pedofilom s plným vedomím, že to robia?"

00000101000635390487989309249124092491860924936809249371
akira
 akira      16.06.2025 - 20:03:33 , level: 1, UP   NEW
Vezmi to z opacnej strany. Keby to bolo nejake tehotne dievca z Bahnhof ZOO, ktore by si chcel zobrat do opatery, alebo za zenu uctyhodny pan profesor tak by sa tomu pomaly aj tlieskalo. Okolo "padlych zien" a dievcat sa uchylosadistov motalo vela.

Tu zas asi bola mantra "otcovsky vzor".