login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[4]: proof-of-stake konsenzus
template:
4
parent:
Re[3]: proof-of-stake konsenzus
owner:
ode
viewed by:
created:
11.12.2024 - 19:58:50
updated:
11.12.2024 - 20:01:29
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63540
63590
9103228
9201175
9201998
9202466
9201889
9202212
9202225
9202482
9202507
9202811
9202856
9202912
9202993
9203003
9203005
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::7
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
to ano. a nie su v POS nejake mechanizmy proti tomu aby sa to stalo?
toto o tom pise ai, ze ciastocne su:
https://chatgpt.com/share/6759e14e-bf6c-800d-8ff4-0dae13575de8
co na to hovoris?
title/content
title
content
user
00000101000635400006359009103228092011750920199809202466092018890920221209202225092024820920250709202811092028560920291209202993092030030920300509203020
niekt0
11.12.2024 - 20:20:16
level: 1
UP
New
Re[5]: proof-of-stake konsenzus
Ze to je v principe neriesitelne, uz samotny BTC a PoW je brutalny hack, kedy problem byzantskych generalov "schovas" do casu, a vyhlasis konflikt realit po case za extremne nepravdepodobny.
V PoS je tento problem v principe neriesitelny, s tym ze existuju rozne sposoby ako obmedzit od akeho mnozstva to bude neriesitelne, pripadne nejak trochu zdvihnut hranicu, ale v momente ked mas dost, tak sa proti tomu v principe branit moc neda.
more children: (2)