Re[7]: Dlllhy objektív wanted :: Something smarter than us is going to emerge


node:	Re[7]: Dlllhy objektív wanted
template:	4
parent:	Re[6]: Dlllhy objektív wanted
owner:	visby
viewed by:
created:	22.01.2024 - 15:20:03

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63537
758948
1102981
9120767
9120904
9120935
9121008
9121110
9121121
9121126
9121132

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

jasne, ak chces pouzivat extender tak s f4 ani nemusis ratat. treba vsak povedat, ze tu sa bavime o porovnani s 70-300 f3-5.6, cize treba zostat trochu pri zemi;-)

na moje cestovanie a tulanie je ta f4ka uplne super.

00000101000635370075894801102981091207670912090409120935091210080912111009121121091211260912113209121134

ved ok, ale na hentom skle pri 300mm tiez budes mat relativne vysoke f-ko (5.6)

ja mam f4-5.6 70-300 L IS a nepouzivam ho sice casto, ale 2 dni dozadu som s nim pri mori fotil pol dna a prekvapeny som, ake vyborne sklo to je a je to takmer 10 rokov stary produkt - https://dustinabbott.net/2015/06/canon-ef-70-300mm-f4-5-6l-is-review/ da sa za nejakych 600 Eur kupit, ale ci by som s nim fotil vtaky, asi nie :)

0000010100063537007589480110298109120767091209040912093509121008091211100912112109121126091211320912113409121137

to je tiez dobre sklo, ale f4ka je uplne dostacujuca. hlavne na spominany crop.

000001010006353700758948011029810912076709120904091209350912100809121110091211210912112609121132091211340912113709122536

f4 staci, 2.8 sklo beries ked na to mas, alebo si to praca pyta
dvihnes kus ISO, a je to, ostre to bude dobre aj na plnu dieru, alebo trosku priclonis - zrejme sme sa este vobec neopytali na output
resiznes na 30-50%, a vybavene

000001010006353700758948011029810912076709120904091209350912100809121110091211210912112609121132091211340912113709121141

jasne. 1.6 crop to ma?

00000101000635370075894801102981091207670912090409120935091210080912111009121121091211260912113209121134091211370912114109121166

afaik hej