a tu je kriticky response od psymposie, tj. ludi, s ktorymi tento diel briefoval:
https://www.psymposia.com/magazine/john-oliver-last-week-tonight-psychedelic-assisted-therapy/

perfektne zhrnute, oi:
Psychedelic science is limited by small sample sizes and methodological issues that cast doubt on flashy efficacy numbers. Many of the most prominent clinical trials failed to control for variability (dosage, therapeutic protocols, etc.) across sites and sessions, which means that their studies are not able to distinguish between effects caused by the drug and effects caused by other variables. Questionable research practices that have compromised research in other fields are happening in psychedelic research, including switching outcome measures and p-hacking to produce the appearance of significant results. There is also a severe lack of long term (or even medium term) follow-up data, along with a lack of attention to overall quality of life. In some studies, participants who were labeled as “cured” actually deteriorated as a result of being in the trial.

Many of the dominant assumptions about psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) are unscientific. Psychedelic therapists and “coaches” often promote untested, magico-religious beliefs. There is no consensus on what constitutes the clinical practice of psychedelic therapy. Instead, fringe and “woo” methods and ideologies pervade the field. Such ideas have already been used to cover up harms and to widely promote unsafe models for use.