login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[7]: Petícia #klímaťapotrebuje
template:
4
parent:
Re[6]: Petícia #klímaťapotrebuje
owner:
dobso
viewed by:
created:
28.09.2020 - 22:12:14
cwbe coordinatez
:
866
1551575
6587946
8787733
8787948
8788236
8788316
8788355
8788363
8788794
8788898
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
⠪
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::4
total children::2
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
Slovensko emisie masivne zvysilo. Akurat ich produkuju inde. Ale pre nas a za nase peniaze. Je to dokazany fakt.
To len k tomu zaveru.
title/content
title
content
user
000008660155157506587946087877330878794808788236087883160878835508788363087887940878889808788907
pht
28.09.2020 - 22:44:04
(modif: 28.09.2020 - 22:51:48) [
1K
] , level: 1,
UP
NEW
!!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Re[8]: Petícia #klímaťapotrebuje
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/production-vs-consumption-co2-emissions?stackMode=relative&time=1990..latest&country=~SVK
https://ourworldindata.org/consumption-based-co2
These comparisons provide the answer to the question whether countries have only achieved emissions reductions by offshoring emissions intensive production to other countries. If only production-based emissions were falling whilst consumption-based emissions were rising, this would suggest it was ‘offshoring’ emissions elsewhere.
There are some countries where this is the case. Examples where production-based emissions have stagnated whilst consumption-based CO2 steadily increased include Ireland in the early 2000s; Norway in the late 1990s and early 2000s; and Switzerland since 1990.
On the other hand there are several very rich countries where both production- and consumption-based emissions have declined. This has been true, among others, for the UK (chart), France (chart), Germany (chart), and the USA (chart). These countries have achieved some genuine reductions without outsourcing the emissions to other countries. Emissions are still too high in all of these countries, but it shows that genuine reductions are possible.
In most countries emissions increased when countries become richer, but this is also not necessarily the case: by comparing the change in consumption-based emissions and economic growth we see that many countries have become much richer while achieving a reduction of emissions.
000008660155157506587946087877330878794808788236087883160878835508788363087887940878889808788902
_____
28.09.2020 - 22:34:31
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re[8]: Petícia #klímaťapotrebuje
Takže znížením slovenských emisií znížime Číne HDP?
Mne šlo o ten vzťah mezi tými veličinami. Emisie sa budú rapídne znížovať odstavením Novák a Vojan I, podobne výrazný efekt by mohla mať elektromobilita či prípadne len zakúpenie a používanie kontrolných vozidiel na odhaľovanie deravých katalyzátorov, či energetický management budov. Toto má mať za následok zníženie HDP?
00000866015515750658794608787733087879480878823608788316087883550878836308788794087888980878890208788970
dobso
29.09.2020 - 09:51:50
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[9]: Petícia #klímaťapotrebuje
nie, zníženie HDP má za následok zníženie emisií. Len pre úplnosť, bavíme sa o klíme a teda primárne o emisiách uhlíka.
0000086601551575065879460878773308787948087882360878831608788355087883630878879408788898087889020878897008788998
pht
29.09.2020 - 10:43:45
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[10]: Petícia #klímaťapotrebuje
moze mat a nemusi, pointa je ze je to ovela zlozitejsie a neplatia taketo sedliackym rozumom vydedukovane jednoduche suvislosti.