'ci je nariadenie spravne ak si samo v sebe protireci, navokol mam plno inych fundovanych nazorov ktore tvrdia presny' - ano, takto to teraz je, o tomto hovorim 'deal with it', lebo mas kopec protireciacich nazorov - rovnako napr. zatvarenie obchodov alebo okresov/hranic - kazdy robi nieco ine a nikto ti nehovori preco, tak ako matovic nepovedal preco iba odporuca nosit ruska, ale v obchode to prikazal, a ako babis nepovedal preco ked ich prikazal vsade.

to neznamena slepo verit, ale brat to at its face value - povedali to, lebo na to mali dovod, alebo si mysleli, ze na to maju dovod. Takisto ked to nejaka krajina spravi, musis to posudzovat at its face value, lebo nevies, co zohladnili a o co sa vobec snazili.

uprimne, moj osobny tip v tomto konkretnom pripade je, ze dovody boli dva:
1) (primarny) ze masiek je zufaly nedostatok
2) ze ich ludia nevedia pouzivat
(vid https://twitter.com/leorahorwitzmd/status/1235018922023440385 )

Proste ak veris, ze masky pomahaju, tak si v lose - lose situacii, lebo tak ci tak, schytas brutalny backslash - teraz za to, ze dali 'zle' odporucanie. Keby povedali, ze masky pomahaju, ale nenoste ich, tak by schytali este omnoho vacsi, vsak si to predstav "who chce abe ludia zomierali ked im hovori aby nenosili masky" - a ludia by masky hoardovali este viac, ako teraz. Cize nie, nemam s tym nejaky zavazny problem z mnohych dovodov, napisem iba dva z nich: 1) som rad, ze som to rozhodnutie nemusel robit ja 2) who nie je exekutivny organ, je to odporucanie - kazda krajina sa zariadi podla seba. A este raz, vsimni si ze to podla tvojich predstav nevysvetlila ani jedna jedina z nich Tak mozno mas nerealne ocakavania?

Mohli to spravit lepsie, skoro vsetko sa da spravit lepsie, ale tym to konci. Piaty thread, rozoberacky mesiac po funuse? Give me a break, s ruskom/maskou som rozhodol sa uz davno a dva krat som to prehodnotil - raz som nespravil zmenu a raz som jemne skorigoval spravanie, tym to hasne. Co sa tyka debaty, mame sto omnoho vacsich problemov o ktorych sa debatuje uplne ze nula.

Ja chapem tuto potrebu racionalizovat ale este raz, nie si kvalifikovany tie argumenty posudit, nieto este v relativne kontroverznej teme - toto pisu profesori: "
Finally, WHO concludes that “Cloth masks are not recommended under any circumstance.” This warning is perhaps based on the results of a trial comparing cloth masks with medical masks for healthcare staff in high risk hospital settings in Vietnam, which cautioned against recommending them for healthcare workers. It’s unclear how relevant this finding would be in community settings, especially if the objective is source control. There has been an unfortunate lack of research into cloth masks and no randomised controlled trials seem to have been done on them in community settings. However, homemade cloth masks (although not found to be as effective as surgical masks) have still been shown in laboratory tests to reduce source transmission and block external aerosols.
"
Tak co teraz, pojdes si citat tie clanky a posudzovat, ci mali dobru metodiku a ci p values su dost signifikantne? Alebo to zavrhnes, lebo su nedoveryhodni lebo pouzivaju p-values? :)

Skoro kazda vec dava viac otazok ako odpovedi, toto nie je ine len preto, ze tu si tie otazky kladies, kym inde si ich nekladies :/.

A btw. toto nie je nariadenie, fakt to je rozdiel, nemal by si to tak volat.