skor len v systeme mozes hladat oporu pre dalsiu emancipaciu- kritika ti pomoze identifikovat protirecenia a trenia ale neda ti odpovede, aj ked neskory program frankfurtskej skoly sa preonacil aj na tuto notu (u nich bol shift ked nastupil fasizmus a silny monopolny stat na kulturnu kritiku od kritiky politickej ekonomie aj ked tato vzdy ostavala v pozadi)

dobre vyvoj FS zhrna esej od seyly benhabib https://analepsis.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/415_mapping-ideology-slavoj-zizek.pdf
tretia esej

toto je z obdobia prechodu:
'This changing function of theory' signals the growing gap between the critical truth of Marxism and the empirical consciousness of the proletariat, which the theory none the less continues to designate as the objective agent of the future transformation of society.[. . .]
Horkheimer maintains that the Marxian critical theory of society has continued to be a
philosophical discipline even when it engages in the critique of the economy; he names the three aspects which constitute the 'philosophical moment' of the critique of political economy. First, the critique of political economy shows the 'transformation of the concepts which dominate the economy into their opposites'. 11 Second, critique is not identical with its object. The critique of political economy does not reify the economy. It defends 'the materialist concept of the free, self-determining society, while retaining from idealism the conviction that men have other possibilities than to lose themselves to the status quo or to accumulate power and profit'. 12 Third, the critique of political economy regards the tendencies of society as a whole and portrays 'the historical movement of the period which is approaching its end'. 13 Horkheimer names these the 'philosophical moments' in the critique of political economy, for each conceptual procedure aims at more than the empirical comprehension of the given laws and structures of society, and judges and analyses what is in the light of a normative standard, namely, the 'realization of the free development of individuals' through the rational constitution of society. For Horkheimer, it is the critique of the given in the name of a Utopian-normative standard that constitutes the legacy of philosophy.