 |
|
| node: | Re[2]: focal length in cinematography |
| template: | 4 |
| parent: | Re: focal length in cinematography |
| owner: | bbs |
| viewed by: | |
| created: | 05.12.2015 - 13:43:58 |
| updated: | 05.12.2015 - 13:45:54 |
|
cwbe coordinatez: 101 63539 4879893 8049658 8049696 8049727 ABSOLUT KYBERIA |
| permissions | |
| you: | r, |
| system: | public |
| net: | yes |
total descendants::1
total children::1
5 ❤️
to video je natacane este pred vznikom youtube cize neni natacane s tym ze natocme to a dajme to na youtube v 360p rozliseni.
uploader co to nahodil sa k tomu dostal dakde v slabsej kvalite.
tu to mas 480p uploadnute o 4roky skor
https://youtu.be/oglDQYd9YNA
e: celkom fajn koment k tomu
"Ironic maybe, but having this video in HD wouldn't really make it any better for explaining its subject. It's not like it's meant to be viewed by a general audience, so there isn't a need to scan the film at a higher resolution at increased time and cost.
You'd be surprised at how much low resolution stuff gets passed around in the film industry internally. Most people who do this stuff for a living don't need to see everything at final quality because they can picture it fine in their head. This is Emmanuel Lubezki's professional showreel. He is (arguably, along with Deakins) the greatest cinematographer currently working, having just won back-to-back Oscars for Gravity and Birdman, has a good chance of three-peating this year with The Revenant, and yet he uploaded his professional work in only 240p.
Speaking of the Oscars, the nominated movies are sent in as DVD screeners to the Academy for evaluation. The awards for Best Picture, Best Cinematography, Best Visual Effects, etc. are all decided based on crappy 480p copies of the movies.
In other words, it's sometimes useful for professionals to judge work based on creative decisions, normalized against technical variables like resolution, camera/lenses quality, etc. which are usually more indicative of budget rather than individual talent. Of course, there is usually a correlation: talented people often have more resources available to them. However, that's not always the case. The Last Airbender cost $150,000,000 to make, while Kevin Smith made Clerks by selling his comic book collection and maxing out some credit cards. Shane Carruth shot Primer for $7,000 and went on to shoot Upstream Color on a ~$500 consumer camera (Panasonic GH2). This year Tangerine, a movie shot entirely on a cellphone, was accepted into Sundance and holds a 96% on Rotten Tomatoes."
uploader co to nahodil sa k tomu dostal dakde v slabsej kvalite.
tu to mas 480p uploadnute o 4roky skor
https://youtu.be/oglDQYd9YNA
e: celkom fajn koment k tomu
"Ironic maybe, but having this video in HD wouldn't really make it any better for explaining its subject. It's not like it's meant to be viewed by a general audience, so there isn't a need to scan the film at a higher resolution at increased time and cost.
You'd be surprised at how much low resolution stuff gets passed around in the film industry internally. Most people who do this stuff for a living don't need to see everything at final quality because they can picture it fine in their head. This is Emmanuel Lubezki's professional showreel. He is (arguably, along with Deakins) the greatest cinematographer currently working, having just won back-to-back Oscars for Gravity and Birdman, has a good chance of three-peating this year with The Revenant, and yet he uploaded his professional work in only 240p.
Speaking of the Oscars, the nominated movies are sent in as DVD screeners to the Academy for evaluation. The awards for Best Picture, Best Cinematography, Best Visual Effects, etc. are all decided based on crappy 480p copies of the movies.
In other words, it's sometimes useful for professionals to judge work based on creative decisions, normalized against technical variables like resolution, camera/lenses quality, etc. which are usually more indicative of budget rather than individual talent. Of course, there is usually a correlation: talented people often have more resources available to them. However, that's not always the case. The Last Airbender cost $150,000,000 to make, while Kevin Smith made Clerks by selling his comic book collection and maxing out some credit cards. Shane Carruth shot Primer for $7,000 and went on to shoot Upstream Color on a ~$500 consumer camera (Panasonic GH2). This year Tangerine, a movie shot entirely on a cellphone, was accepted into Sundance and holds a 96% on Rotten Tomatoes."