login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
focal length in cinematography
template:
4
parent:
Zaujímavosti
owner:
repelent
viewed by:
created:
05.12.2015 - 10:38:43
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63539
4879893
8049658
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
⠪
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::7
total children::2
12
❤️
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
blba zena
0
title/content
title
content
user
0000010100063539048798930804965808049735
ch
05.12.2015 - 13:59:46
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re: focal length in cinematography
kks ta shelley vyzera uplne super
000001010006353904879893080496580804973508049747
repelent
05.12.2015 - 14:43:21
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[2]: focal length in cinematography
trochu mi pripominala mary louise parker (vo weeds co hrala)
0000010100063539048798930804965808049696
killya
05.12.2015 - 12:26:18
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re: focal length in cinematography
je to zaujimave, ale preco to preboha robia 360p???
000001010006353904879893080496580804969608049727
bbs
05.12.2015 - 13:43:58
(modif: 05.12.2015 - 13:45:54) [
5K
] , level: 2,
UP
NEW
!!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Re[2]: focal length in cinematography
to video je natacane este pred vznikom youtube cize neni natacane s tym ze natocme to a dajme to na youtube v 360p rozliseni.
uploader co to nahodil sa k tomu dostal dakde v slabsej kvalite.
tu to mas 480p uploadnute o 4roky skor
https://youtu.be/oglDQYd9YNA
e: celkom fajn koment k tomu
"Ironic maybe, but having this video in HD wouldn't really make it any better for explaining its subject. It's not like it's meant to be viewed by a general audience, so there isn't a need to scan the film at a higher resolution at increased time and cost.
You'd be surprised at how much low resolution stuff gets passed around in the film industry internally. Most people who do this stuff for a living don't need to see everything at final quality because they can picture it fine in their head. This is
Emmanuel Lubezki's professional showreel
. He is (arguably, along with Deakins) the greatest cinematographer currently working, having just won back-to-back Oscars for Gravity and Birdman, has a good chance of three-peating this year with The Revenant, and yet he uploaded his professional work in only 240p.
Speaking of the Oscars, the nominated movies are sent in as DVD screeners to the Academy for evaluation. The awards for Best Picture, Best Cinematography, Best Visual Effects, etc. are all decided based on crappy 480p copies of the movies.
In other words, it's sometimes useful for professionals to judge work based on creative decisions, normalized against technical variables like resolution, camera/lenses quality, etc. which are usually more indicative of budget rather than individual talent. Of course, there is usually a correlation: talented people often have more resources available to them. However, that's not always the case. The Last Airbender cost
$150,000,000
to make, while Kevin Smith made
Clerks
by selling his comic book collection and maxing out some credit cards. Shane Carruth shot Primer for
$7,000
and went on to shoot
Upstream Color
on a ~$500 consumer camera (Panasonic GH2). This year
Tangerine
, a movie shot entirely on a cellphone, was accepted into Sundance and holds a
96% on Rotten Tomatoes
."
00000101000635390487989308049658080496960804972708049797
azazel_the_real_one{outKasted}{outKasted}
05.12.2015 - 17:39:26
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[3]: focal length in cinematography
This year Tangerine, a movie shot entirely on a cellphone, was accepted into Sundance and holds a 96% on Rotten Tomatoes."
Mno, neviem, pouzivat kamery v dnesnych telefonoch ako etalon shitu, to je trochu mimo.
000001010006353904879893080496580804969608049723
repelent
05.12.2015 - 13:39:50
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[2]: focal length in cinematography
ja som tak nejako tipol, ze to ma 30 rokov to video
ale nevidim tam ziaden rok, tak neviem :)
00000101000635390487989308049658080496960804972308050037
superpussy
06.12.2015 - 11:47:30
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[3]: focal length in cinematography
je to z roku 2010