total descendants::1 total children::1 |
"Despite the solid arguments by the defense, the ICSID tribunal ruled against Uruguay and decided to hear Philip Morris’ demands, disregarding the fact that the bilateral investment treaty between Switzerland and Uruguay -which the tobacco company used to base its claim-, unequivocally states in its Article 2 that public health measures cannot be challenged by investors as an indirect expropriation of their investments." V odkaze vyššie. Ale prečo by korporácie mali mať právo zažalovať za ušlý zisk krajiny, ktoré si demokratickými zákonmi chránia zdravie? Navyše cez proces, ktorý je absolútne nedemokratický. To je dobrá otázka. Poznáš stránku, kde sa dozvieš komplexné informácie o tejto problematike? |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||