 |
|
| node: | Re[5]: Cold fusion reactor verified by third-party researchers, seems to have 1 million times the energy density of gasoline |
| template: | 4 |
| parent: | Re[4]: Cold fusion reactor verified by third-party researchers, seems to have 1 million times the energy density of gasoline |
| owner: | mirex |
| viewed by: | |
| created: | 13.10.2014 - 12:59:22 |
| updated: | 13.10.2014 - 12:59:46 |
|
cwbe coordinatez: 866 1551575 1303683 7727833 7728252 7728389 7728419 7728440 7728575 ABSOLUT KYBERIA |
| permissions | |
| you: | r, |
| system: | public |
| net: | yes |
total descendants::0
total children::0
Prelinkovany clanok: http://www.science20.com/a_quantum_diaries_survivor/cold_fusion_a_better_study_on_the_infamous_ecat-146700
... the study betrays one of its major shortcomings in clear already on page 7, when it clarifies that the inventor of the device took part in the experimental activities:
"Rossi intervened to switch off the dummy," (the reactor unloaded with reactant) " and in the following subsequent operations on the E-Cat: charge insertion, reactor startup, reactor shutdown and powder charge extraction."
This means that part of the test was conducted with the physical presence of Rossi in the critical phases.
...
The absolutely mandatory requirement for an independent test is the total absence of the interested party from the scene. So it is a rather idle occupation to read the rest of the 53-page document.
http://news.newenergytimes.net/2014/10/12/rossi-handles-samples-in-alleged-independent-test-of-his-device/
“The dummy reactor was switched on at 12:20 p.m. of 24 February 2014 by Andrea Rossi who gradually brought it to the power level requested by us,” the authors wrote. “Rossi later intervened to switch off the dummy, and in the following subsequent operations on the E-Cat: [powder] charge insertion, reactor startup, reactor shutdown and powder charge extraction. Throughout the test, no further intervention or interference on his part occurred; moreover, all phases of the test were monitored directly by the collaboration.”
The authors failed to remain in full control of the material they tested. The samples they sent for testing could have come from anywhere.
... the study betrays one of its major shortcomings in clear already on page 7, when it clarifies that the inventor of the device took part in the experimental activities:
"Rossi intervened to switch off the dummy," (the reactor unloaded with reactant) " and in the following subsequent operations on the E-Cat: charge insertion, reactor startup, reactor shutdown and powder charge extraction."
This means that part of the test was conducted with the physical presence of Rossi in the critical phases.
...
The absolutely mandatory requirement for an independent test is the total absence of the interested party from the scene. So it is a rather idle occupation to read the rest of the 53-page document.
http://news.newenergytimes.net/2014/10/12/rossi-handles-samples-in-alleged-independent-test-of-his-device/
“The dummy reactor was switched on at 12:20 p.m. of 24 February 2014 by Andrea Rossi who gradually brought it to the power level requested by us,” the authors wrote. “Rossi later intervened to switch off the dummy, and in the following subsequent operations on the E-Cat: [powder] charge insertion, reactor startup, reactor shutdown and powder charge extraction. Throughout the test, no further intervention or interference on his part occurred; moreover, all phases of the test were monitored directly by the collaboration.”
The authors failed to remain in full control of the material they tested. The samples they sent for testing could have come from anywhere.