login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[7]: Konzervativizmus alebo
liberalizmus? Radšej kritické myslenie
template:
4
parent:
Re[6]: Konzervativizmus alebo
liberalizmus? Radšej kritické myslenie
owner:
vposled [locked out]
viewed by:
created:
19.03.2014 - 20:18:46
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63539
63556
63998
7533618
7533653
7533951
7534003
7534023
7534039
7534047
7534463
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
⠪
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::1
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
ehm. sekularne eticke myslenie je imho jedno z najstarsich. konkretne skoro 2,5 tisica rokov. Vid Sokrates a Platon.
title/content
title
content
user
00000101000635390006355600063998075336180753365307533951075340030753402307534039075340470753446307534472
ritomak
19.03.2014 - 20:28:47
(modif: 19.03.2014 - 20:54:47), level: 1,
UP
NEW
!!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Re[8]: Konzervativizmus alebo liberalizmus? Radšej kritické myslenie
kedze sam nemam tuto tezu nastudovanu, zatial ti mozem poskytnut iba jedno voditko (argument, ktory odznel v Singerovej prednaske):
“Belief in God, or in many gods, prevented the free development of moral reasoning. Disbelief in God, openly admitted by a majority, is a recent event, not yet completed. Because this event is so recent, Non-religious Ethics is at a very early stage. We cannot yet predict whether, as in Mathematics, we will reach agreement. Since we cannot know how Ethics will develop, it is not irrational to have high hopes.”
Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons, 1984, p. 454.