 |
|
| node: | Re[5]: ssddead |
| template: | 4 |
| parent: | Re[5]: ssddead |
| owner: | kkappabear |
| viewed by: | |
| created: | 07.01.2014 - 09:28:24 |
|
cwbe coordinatez: 101 63540 63709 7448439 7448460 7449585 7449658 7449669 7449962 7451002 ABSOLUT KYBERIA |
| permissions | |
| you: | r, |
| system: | public |
| net: | yes |
total descendants::3
total children::2
tom's hardware robil nejake vacsie porovnanie. vysledky +/- takto:
- MTBF tells you nothing about reliability.
- The annualized failure rate (AFR) is higher than what manufacturers claim.
- Drives do not have a tendency to fail during the first year of use. Failure rates steadily increase with age.
- SMART is not a reliable warning system for impending failure detection.
- The failure rates of “enterprise” and “consumer” drives are very much similar.
- The failure of one drive in an array increases the likelihood of another drive failure.
- Temperature has a minor effect on failure rates.
a ak je rychlost issue, tak je ssd jasna volba, len zalohovat ofc treba stale
- MTBF tells you nothing about reliability.
- The annualized failure rate (AFR) is higher than what manufacturers claim.
- Drives do not have a tendency to fail during the first year of use. Failure rates steadily increase with age.
- SMART is not a reliable warning system for impending failure detection.
- The failure rates of “enterprise” and “consumer” drives are very much similar.
- The failure of one drive in an array increases the likelihood of another drive failure.
- Temperature has a minor effect on failure rates.
a ak je rychlost issue, tak je ssd jasna volba, len zalohovat ofc treba stale