cwbe coordinatez:
101
63540
63709
7448439
7448460
7449585

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::7
total children::1
show[ 2 | 3] flat
ako pise Ciny, bez zalohovania zbytocne riziko.
a neviem odkial to mam, kazdopadne mam ssdcka zafixovane ako flashky - pojde to rok, dva, potom cakaj problemy;)




00000101000635400006370907448439074484600744958507449658
mirex
 mirex      05.01.2014 - 22:32:27 , level: 1, UP   NEW
No to snad nie, u nas v praci sa uz bezne kupuju pracovne notebooky s SSD diskami namiesto beznych. Ak by za rok-dva odisli tak by to bolo... nevhodne.

0000010100063540000637090744843907448460074495850744965807449669
kkappabear
 kkappabear      05.01.2014 - 22:41:24 , level: 2, UP   NEW
u nas v robote 2/10 ssdciek starsich ako 1 rok, naposledy kolegov notebook 8 mesacny, po nabootovani po obede bluescreen a naslednu uplny koniec :/...
na zaklade toho som doma pustil s.m.a.r.t. ktory ukazal 100%.. dva dni na to ssd padlo aj doma;)

000001010006354000063709074484390744846007449585074496580744966907449962
mirex
 mirex      06.01.2014 - 10:55:51 , level: 3, UP   NEW
Fuha, musim pogooglit nieco k tomuto, aby som o tom vedel varovat kolegov v praci. Nemate nahodou nejaky clanok k teme, ktory by to dokazoval?

Je to skoda, lebo narocne diskove operacie su u nas na SSD asi 4-6x rychlejsie, to co na beznom starsom notebooku s HDD trva 5-10 minut, to trva na novsom 1-2 minuty.

00000101000635400006370907448439074484600744958507449658074496690744996207451002
kkappabear
 kkappabear      07.01.2014 - 09:28:24 , level: 4, UP   NEW
tom's hardware robil nejake vacsie porovnanie. vysledky +/- takto:
- MTBF tells you nothing about reliability.
- The annualized failure rate (AFR) is higher than what manufacturers claim.
- Drives do not have a tendency to fail during the first year of use. Failure rates steadily increase with age.
- SMART is not a reliable warning system for impending failure detection.
- The failure rates of “enterprise” and “consumer” drives are very much similar.
- The failure of one drive in an array increases the likelihood of another drive failure.
- Temperature has a minor effect on failure rates.

a ak je rychlost issue, tak je ssd jasna volba, len zalohovat ofc treba stale

0000010100063540000637090744843907448460074495850744965807449669074499620745100207454643
fat^boy
 fat^boy      09.01.2014 - 19:21:40 , level: 5, UP   NEW
nevies ako to je s hybridmi? prip. skusenosti s tym? (ssd + hdd v jednom tele)

000001010006354000063709074484390744846007449585074496580744966907449962074510020745464307455661
kkappabear
 kkappabear      10.01.2014 - 15:53:36 , level: 6, UP   NEW
priznam sa ze absolutne netusim

0000010100063540000637090744843907448460074495850744965807449669074499620745100207451078
mirex
 mirex      07.01.2014 - 10:17:34 , level: 5, UP   NEW
okej, ale tiez tam pisu:
...according to Dr. Hughes, there's nothing to suggest that its products are significantly more reliable than the best hard drive solutions. We don’t have failure rates beyond two years of use for SSDs, so it’s possible that this story will change.

Takze zatial z toho citam ze chybovost hdd a sdd su porovnatelne ale SMART info je na sdd horsie.