cwbe coordinatez:
101
63533
5211994
7355301
7355598
7355656
7355848
7356474

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::4
total children::1
show[ 2 | 3] flat
znamena to, ze realne energia z fuzie < nez energia dodana na zacatie fuzie?
energia, ktoru ta fuzia vytvorila, by nedokazala sama zafinancovat jej zacatie?
porovnavaju len cisto izolovane hodnoty, energia fuzie vs energia vzniknuta na spicke laseroveho dela? vylucili energeticke naklady na nazhavenie dela atd. atd.?




000001010006353305211994073553010735559807355656073558480735647407356479
Thunder Perfect Mind
 Thunder Perfect Mind      10.10.2013 - 17:13:55 , level: 1, UP   NEW
ano
The input to the lasers is 422 MJ. The output is 1.8 MJ. So if the input/output was ~1.8 MJ, then the system as a whole is operating at about 0.4% of break even.

00000101000635330521199407355301073555980735565607355848073564740735647907356484
killya
 killya      10.10.2013 - 17:17:33 , level: 2, UP   NEW
cize v podstate sa jedna o dokaz, ze fuziu mozno "vyrobit" ludskymi prostriedkami, ale treba to este doladit, nech output energy > input energy a teda nech ma fuzia vobec prakticky zmysel?

0000010100063533052119940735530107355598073556560735584807356474073564790735648407356497
Thunder Perfect Mind
 Thunder Perfect Mind      10.10.2013 - 17:26:40 , level: 3, UP   NEW
Podla toho co je prakticky zmysel. Vodikova bomba je tiez fuzna :)
Zariadenie s kontrolovanou fuziou (ci uz laser, tokamak alebo co) a (stabilnym, prakticky vyuzitelnym) kladnym energetickym vysledkom aktualne myslim neexistuje, ale teoreticky mozne je, preto sa stavia ITER a pod.

000001010006353305211994073553010735559807355656073558480735647407356479073564840735649707356505
killya
 killya      10.10.2013 - 17:32:48 , level: 4, UP   NEW
parada, diky. pozrem si nejaky dokument o iteri