login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[13]: micro3/4 vs zrkadlovka
template:
4
parent:
Re[12]: micro3/4 vs zrkadlovka
owner:
pxls.jpg
viewed by:
created:
23.09.2013 - 15:10:03
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63537
758948
1102981
7335850
7335881
7335902
7335911
7335958
7336061
7336092
7336106
7336117
7336126
7336192
7336212
7336244
7336456
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
⠪
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::2
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
17-85 je vacsi, tazsi, drahsi a vo vsetkom okrem ostrenia horsi objektiv oproti 18-55 IS co je v kite
title/content
title
content
user
00000101000635370075894801102981073358500733588107335902073359110733595807336061073360920733610607336117073361260733619207336212073362440733645607337212
visby
24.09.2013 - 07:56:36
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re[14]: micro3/4 vs zrkadlovka
na 18-55 mi chyba prave vacsi zoom na konci, preto pokukavam po 17-85.
v com sa prejavi to, ze je horsi?
0000010100063537007589480110298107335850073358810733590207335911073359580733606107336092073361060733611707336126073361920733621207336244073364560733721207337732
pxls.jpg
24.09.2013 - 15:10:15
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[15]: micro3/4 vs zrkadlovka
prejavi sa to na kresbe v rohoch, ktora je v celom rozsahu slabsia. na sirokom konci podstatne slabsia.