Re[8]: 02.10.2011-14:27:29 :: Something smarter than us is going to emerge


node:	Re[8]: 02.10.2011-14:27:29
template:	4
parent:	Re[7]: 02.10.2011-14:27:29
owner:	..............
viewed by:
created:	03.10.2011 - 12:32:15
updated:	03.10.2011 - 12:35:56

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63529
63883
6248511
6248621
6248809
6248926
6248992
6249009
6249201
6249438
6249828

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

http://www.petitionproject.org/

a je smutne ked si po 6-7 rokoch studia dospel ku conclusionu, ze je manmade global warming je real:) velmi smutne:) aj tvoj oblubeny telegraph ti povie, ze je to hoax

00000101000635290006388306248511062486210624880906248926062489920624900906249201062494380624982806249928

2 roky stary clanok o 2 roky starej kauze, ktora nakoniec ziadnou kauzou - alebo nie takou, o ktorej maju mokre sny 'skeptici' - nebola, pretoze sa ukazalo ze o ziadnu manipulaciu neslo (fakt si precitaj toho Mullera -> http://www.berkeleyearth.org/Resources/Muller_Testimony_31_March_2011 ). To je to najlepsie co vies na tuto temu vyprodukovat? Som sklamany.

0000010100063529000638830624851106248621062488090624892606248992062490090624920106249438062498280624992806250096

ad muller http://my.telegraph.co.uk/earthyissues/martin_lack/246/definitive-hockey-stick-hoax-exposed/
http://climatechangepsychology.blogspot.com/2011/04/richard-muller-is-well-bad-tosser-and.html
http://www.climatedepot.com/a/10426/Climate-Depot-Round-Up-on-Richard-Muller-Scientists-trashing-Mullers-workMuller-stands-accused-of-being-front-man-for-geoengineering-org--Muller-Responds-to-Climate-Depot
to som tak dorychla nasiel

000001010006352900063883062485110624862106248809062489260624899206249009062492010624943806249828062499280625009606250130

tomu celkom nerozumiem.

Muller je typek plateny o.i. Kochovcami; spravil analyzu GW dat, aby (v sulade s cielom svojich zakaznikov) dokazal ze vysledky su manipulovane, ale vyslo mu (predbezne, vo vystupeni v americkom kongrese), ze nie su. (Clanok ktory linkujes vysiel este predtym ako toto zverejnil)
Inak povedane, zda sa ze ide cloveka ktory sa nechal presvedcit faktami aj ked nesuhlasia s jeho presvedcenim (alebo peniazmi).

0000010100063529000638830624851106248621062488090624892606248992062490090624920106249438062498280624992806250073

haha no nikto ma neplati, za to, aby som nieco produkoval.. za tie roky som presiel fakt 100vky clankov a je uplne obvious, ze co2 global warming je scam:) ako som vyssie povedal, hladiny co2 sa zvysuju kvoli otepleniu, nie naopak. dalsia vec, ze ludsky prispevok co2 do atmosfery je zanedbatelny a zvysena hladina co2 je beneficial pre vsetko zive:) ked si za 6-7 rokov nedokazal prist na tieto basic fakty, tak niekde je problem:) aj tak podla mna ti to je jasne a len trollujes

000001010006352900063883062485110624862106248809062489260624899206249009062492010624943806249828062499280625007306262381

tak si ostal na urovni Vaclava Klausa, uz aj Bjorn Lomborg priznal, ze sa mylil.

00000101000635290006388306248511062486210624880906248926062489920624900906249201062494380624982806249928062500730626238106262797

nizsie mas link na peticiu 30,000 vedcov, ktory v podstate prehlasuju, ze cela global warming co2 manbearpig agenda je podvod a, ze neexistuje hodnoverna vedecka teoria, ktora by podporovala ich zavery. inac ty si mal tento rok rekordne teply? pozri si co bolo na antarktide http://faculty.washington.edu/steig/papers/recent/SchneiderSteigGRL2006.pdf posledne desiatky rokov sa napr na antarktide ochladzuje. e: trosku o pozadi veci o ktorych tu je rec http://kremlik.blog.idnes.cz/c/207841/Bert-Bolin-Kmotr-globalniho-oteplovani.html

0000010100063529000638830624851106248621062488090624892606248992062490090624920106249438062498280624992806250073062623810626279706263158

dik za clanok...
"Antarctic continent has experienced modest warming over the last
150 years. Similar phasing as the SH mean temperature record
suggests that this warming may be linked to global
changes and suggests that Antarctica will warm in parallel
with the SH, in general accordance with model-based predictions
[e.g., Shindell and Schmidt, 2004]."

kde je ten link na peticiu?

000001010006352900063883062485110624862106248809062489260624899206249009062492010624943806249828062499280625007306262381062627970626315806263619

1, moderate warming <0.5°C, viac sa oteplovalo napr v rokoch 1910-1945 ako teraz:) asi vela vtedy kravy prdeli

2, http://www.petitionproject.org/

o godfatherovi co2 scamu si si precital?

00000101000635290006388306248511062486210624880906248926062489920624900906249201062494380624982806249928062500730626238106262797062631580626361906264569

No hej, existuju totiz slnecne cykly a s nimi spojena variabilita klimy, niektore cykly sa opakuju... su modely co hovoria o tom, ako by vyzerala klima bez human released CO2, v tom clanku to ti vedci podla mna pochopili a preto je conclusion take, ake je.

0000010100063529000638830624851106248621062488090624892606248992062490090624920106249438062498280624992806250073062623810626279706263158062636190626456906265357

http://bedfordmatters.blogspot.com/2011/09/other-climate-theory-al-gore-wont-hear.html napr vysvetlenie z ineho sudka
--
"The claim … is that the temperature has changed from ~288.0 to ~288.8 degree Kelvin in about 150 years, which (if true) means to me is that the temperature has been amazingly stable, and both human health and happiness have definitely improved in this 'warming' period," his email message said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/09/14/nobel-prize-winning-physicist-resigns-from-top-physics-group-over-global/#ixzz1aPwpR5q7 (fox news rulez:))
--
http://heartland.org/press-releases/2011/08/29/new-report-global-warming-contradicts-uns-ipcc

asi tak nejak

0000010100063529000638830624851106248621062488090624892606248992062490090624920106249438062498280624992806250073062623810626279706263158062636190626456906264666

co podla teba pochopili?

000001010006352900063883062485110624862106248809062489260624899206249009062492010624943806249828062499280625007306262381062627970626315806263619062645690626466606267352

suggests that this warming may be linked to global changes...

vyjadrili sa velmi vedecky, pouzili slovicka, ktore pouziva aj IPCC a nik si ich nevsima. Vea je o presnom vyjadrovani sa, ktore je pradoxne presne vdaka terminom, ktore uvazuju o neistotach (uncertainties).

00000101000635290006388306248511062486210624880906248926062489920624900906249201062494380624982806249928062500730626238106262797062631580626361906264569062646660626735206267903

ide o hodnotu toho warmingu ale:) takato mala zmena je uplne normalna