login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[8]: 01.02.2011-21:18:57
template:
4
parent:
Re[7]: 01.02.2011-21:18:57
owner:
visby
viewed by:
created:
04.02.2011 - 09:15:35
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63540
2111157
5047497
2000633
5800737
5801058
5801257
5801368
5801522
5802508
5802825
5802860
5806746
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
⠪
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::7
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
podla tych blogov tie vyrazili skusili hladat -> nic, po tyzdni -> bingo...
ako moze bing dojst na to, ktora stranka je za tym nahodnym slovom ak nie z googlu?
title/content
title
content
user
000001010006354002111157050474970200063305800737058010580580125705801368058015220580250805802825058028600580674605807867
repelent
04.02.2011 - 14:55:36
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re[9]: 01.02.2011-21:18:57
cital si ten blog, alebo to co som napisal vyssie?
We gave 20 of our engineers laptops with a fresh install of Microsoft Windows running Internet Explorer 8 with Bing Toolbar installed. As part of the install process, we opted in to the “Suggested Sites” feature of IE8, and we accepted the default options for the Bing Toolbar.
We asked these engineers to
enter the synthetic queries into the search box on the Google home page, and click on the results
, i.e., the results we inserted.
00000101000635400211115705047497020006330580073705801058058012570580136805801522058025080580282505802860058067460580786705808025
visby
04.02.2011 - 15:55:50
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[10]: 01.02.2011-21:18:57
hej, cize ked v IE8 nieco v nejakom vyhladavaci vyhladas, kliknes na vysledok tak IE8 to posle bingu ako relevantny link -> co na tom nie je kradnutie vysledkov?
0000010100063540021111570504749702000633058007370580105805801257058013680580152205802508058028250580286005806746058078670580802505811574
b.b.
06.02.2011 - 15:53:45
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[11]: 01.02.2011-21:18:57
No to nie je jenoznacne, presne to iste robi aj google toolbar. Keby bol bing trhova jednotka a google dvojka, tak by bola situacia presne opacna. Google by "kradol" vysledky bingu. Z toho vyplyva ze jedina chyba microsoftu v tomto pripade je to ze nie su jednotka.
0000010100063540021111570504749702000633058007370580105805801257058013680580152205802508058028250580286005806746058078670580802505808054
repelent
04.02.2011 - 16:08:13
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[11]: 01.02.2011-21:18:57
nic. je to trackovanie pohybu, ktore useri dobrovolne zapli. tak isto mohli spravi dve staticke html, na ne klikat a bing by sa to naucil (akurat by to zrejme muselo byt na high-rank domene). a som si 100% isty, ze to iste robi google pri zohladnovani ranku a relevantnosti
000001010006354002111157050474970200063305800737058010580580125705801368058015220580250805802825058028600580674605807867058080250580805405809368
visby
05.02.2011 - 11:20:36
, level: 4,
UP
NEW
Re[12]: 01.02.2011-21:18:57
cize relevanciu dokazu zobrat iba z jednej veliciny. mne to pride moc slabe na to aby to vyhladavac ukazal...
00000101000635400211115705047497020006330580073705801058058012570580136805801522058025080580282505802860058067460580786705808025058080540580936805809628
repelent
05.02.2011 - 13:41:53
, level: 5,
UP
NEW
Re[13]: 01.02.2011-21:18:57
ide o slova ku ktorym inak nepozna ziadne vysledky. teda aj takato slaba vec ich dostane na prve miesto
0000010100063540021111570504749702000633058007370580105805801257058013680580152205802508058028250580286005806746058078670580802505808042
drakh
04.02.2011 - 16:03:11
[
1K
] , level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[11]: 01.02.2011-21:18:57
zoberme si cechy kde seznam videol pred googlom, takze ked juzri hladali na sezname google robil to iste ako majkrofost..