pribeh o samopale thompson : ) :: Remember, remember, the velvet November


node:	pribeh o samopale thompson : )
template:	4
parent:	Bojová technika
owner:	dnc
viewed by:
created:	01.10.2010 - 00:08:07

cwbe coordinatez:
101
63533
2129387
5577266

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

neurons
stats|by_visit|by_K source tiamat K|my_K|given_K last commanders polls
total descendants::4
total children::2
show[ 2 | 3] flat

- Dmitriji Fjodoroviči, v každém Shermanu, který dorazil do SSSR byly osobní zbraně, samopaly Thompson (také známé jako Tommy gun). Četl jsem, že vojáci v týlu tyto zbraně kradli a jen velmi málo tanků dorazilo na místo určení s těmito samopaly. Jaké zbraně jste měli, americké nebo sovětské?

- Každý Sherman dorazil se dvěma samopaly Thompson ráže 11.43mm (.45 cal), vskutku velký náboj! Ale ten samopal byl k ničemu. Měli jsme s ním špatné zkušenosti. Několik našich mužů se dostalo do hádky, měli na sobě vycpávané pláště. Jejich hádka se zvrhla a oni na sebe vystřelili, kulka se zavrtala do pláště. Tolik k bezcennému samopalu. Vezměte si německý samopal se skládací pažbou (samopal MP-40 od Ermy -Valera). Milovali jsme ho pro jeho skladnost. Thompson byl velký. V tanku jste se s ním nemohli otočit.
http://worldatwar.eu/index.php?esid=563009a2905b8ce951714aa4bb3a5bd5〈=3&refcode=0&location=article&articleid=47&categoryid=1

0000010100063533021293870557726605577551

s tym priestrelom si nejsom isty
s tym, ze to bola velka kurva oproti mp-40 alebo aj ppške tak to hej
je to celkom neprakticke, behat s nim. velke jak assault rifle ale nema potrebny punch (realny)

000001010006353302129387055772660557755105577703

je to taky urban legend rusky s tym presivakom a tommy gunom, ja viem : )

prekvapilo ma celkom, ze ten rus nedal dopustit na sherman..
prijemne citanie celkom

00000101000635330212938705577266055775510557770305577790

ani sa nedivim. oni proti beznym nemeckym tankom neboli zle (PZ III & IV)

onehdy ma IRL strasne nasral jeden lavicak, ked sme sa hadlai o pomoci USA a kde by asi europa skoncila, nebyt us..
mi tam daval pocty produkcie sovietskych tankov z roku 45(co si on neuvedomoval) tak som ho musel poopravit :)

"From 1941 and onwards, the RKKA used extensive numbers of Lend-Lease tanks received from the USA, Canada and Great Britain. Approximately 22.800 AFVs (tanky) were sent to the Soviet Union between June 22nd of 1941 to 30th of April 1944, and almost 2.000 of these were lost at sea.

In addition, the Russians got about 351.700 trucks and 78.000 Jeeps from the USA.

During 1941, 487 Matilda, Valentine and Tetrarch tanks were received from Great Britain, and 182 M3A1 "Stuart", and M3 Lee medium tanks were received from the USA. In 1942, a further 2.487 tanks were received from the UK, and 3.023 tanks from the USA. The first units equipped with Valentines and Matilda IIs fought in the Staraya Russia and Valdai areas in the winter of 1941/42. Usually tank units were allotted a single type of Lend-Lease tanks to simplify logistics. An example was the 38th Tank Brigade which in 1942 had 30 Matilda II tanks, and 16 T-60 light tanks. In 1944 and 1945, the American M4A2 were the highest appreciated Lend/Lease tank, and some tank corps and mechanized corps were entirely equipped with this type. In early 1945 the 1st Guards Mechanized Corps were equipped with Shermans in all of its tank units."

"This means that on December 20, 1941, 46 British tanks were employed on the Moscow sector, whereas on January 1, 1942, this number had increased to 51 tanks.

Hill, however, claims that at the end of November there were only 205 heavy and medium Soviet-built tanks in front of Moscow. At the same time, he states that 30-40% of the heavy and medium tank park available to Soviet forces on this same sector were British-built. This would mean roughly in excess of 70 British-built tanks in Soviet units on December, 1st. Strange, considering that both Moshchanskiy and Baryartinskiy have only 1 Soviet front line formation having British tanks on that date and possessing no more than 12 in number, with several of them broken down. It does not help that Hill merely states "available statistics" and "researchers estimate" without showing those statistics or naming those researchers. Nor does he provide any concrete breakdown of numbers within the units he specifies."

0000010100063533021293870557726605577310

lol

Verba ita sunt intelligenda, ut res magis valeat quam perea...