cwbe coordinatez:
101
63539
934015
5428597

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::17
total children::2
show[ 2 | 3] flat


dufam ze ghana prejde dalej. boli lepsi.
pici taku sancu zahodit.




0000010100063539009340150542859705428607
jejz
 jejz      02.07.2010 - 23:17:48 (modif: 02.07.2010 - 23:19:12), level: 1, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
pica maria!
vedel som ze tu poslednu da dostredu. keby ti brankari cakali na strelu tak pochytaju ovela viac penalt. kingson by chytil dve. tipoval smer, chytil picu.

000001010006353900934015054285970542860705428618
eyo
 eyo      02.07.2010 - 23:29:09 , level: 2, UP   NEW
keby zas cakal uruguajsky brankar v strede tak by mozno nechytil tie dve rozhodujuce.

urcite okolo toho existuje x serioznych odbornych studii a statistik od ludi co sa tomu venuju cely zivot a doteraz nikdo neprisiel na to, ze je lepsie stat v strede miesto odhadovania smeru strely? a ty si kolko tych penalt pochytal? tie vo fifa 2010 nepocitajme :)

00000101000635390093401505428597054286070542861805428669
jejz
 jejz      03.07.2010 - 00:03:53 (modif: 03.07.2010 - 00:08:31), level: 3, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
to su take studie...
Kingson tipoval smer. dobre kopnute nechytil, zle kopnute nechytil.
Keby Kingson cakal, dobre kopnute by aj tak nechytil ale tie dve lacno kopnute ano.
toto plati pri kazdom penaltovom rozstrele.

navyse keby to brankari trenovali, reflexy a tak, vedeli by chytit aj narocnejsu strelu.
tipovanie je picovina.

ale staci kopat penalty ako ghana kopla tie prve dve v rozstrele a brankar nema sancu.
dobre kopnuta penalta sa neda chytit :)

0000010100063539009340150542859705428607054286180542866905428769
G
 G      03.07.2010 - 02:17:14 , level: 4, UP   NEW
trepes

000001010006353900934015054285970542860705428618054286690542876905428776
chav
 chav      03.07.2010 - 02:37:03 , level: 5, UP   NEW
big time!

0000010100063539009340150542859705428607054286180542866905428707
eyo
 eyo      03.07.2010 - 00:40:02 (modif: 03.07.2010 - 00:43:54), level: 4, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
"to su take studie..." sorry, ale tieto tvoje krcmove mudrosti bez ziadnej realnej skusenosti nezneju o nic serioznejsie.

myslis, ze brankari netrenuju reflexy?

s tou poslednou vetou sa da rozhodne suhlasit.

000001010006353900934015054285970542860705428618054286690542870705429066
onto
 onto      03.07.2010 - 16:57:05 , level: 5, UP   NEW
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8H-4MWXT31-1/2/de2ed05c062a4eb553de83c8a19dee3c

In soccer penalty kicks, goalkeepers choose their action before they can clearly observe the kick direction. An analysis of 286 penalty kicks in top leagues and championships worldwide shows that given the probability distribution of kick direction, the optimal strategy for goalkeepers is to stay in the goal’s center. Goalkeepers, however, almost always jump right or left. We propose the following explanation for this behavior: because the norm is to jump, norm theory (Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153) implies that a goal scored yields worse feelings for the goalkeeper following inaction (staying in the center) than following action (jumping), leading to a bias for action. The omission bias, a bias in favor of inaction, is reversed here because the norm here is reversed – to act rather than to choose inaction. The claim that jumping is the norm is supported by a second study, a survey conducted with 32 top professional goalkeepers. The seemingly biased decision making is particularly striking since the goalkeepers have huge incentives to make correct decisions, and it is a decision they encounter frequently. Finally, we discuss several implications of the action/omission bias for economics and management.

000001010006353900934015054285970542860705428618054286690542870705428771
chlapik
 chlapik      03.07.2010 - 02:20:38 , level: 5, UP   NEW
tej uruguajec co sa rozbiehal 20 metrov, to som uplne vedel, ze to da do hladiska.
a ten ghanan, co to kopal z miesta, to bola jasna placirka do rohu.
vela zalezi na tom, ako sa hrac rozbieha, brankari merkuju penalty hracov z inych zapasov atd..
stat v strede je rozhodne kokotina. :D

00000101000635390093401505428597054286070542861805428623
||||||||||
 ||||||||||      02.07.2010 - 23:32:04 , level: 3, UP   NEW
no tu prvu by chmatol urcite

0000010100063539009340150542859705428607054286180542862305428627
eyo
 eyo      02.07.2010 - 23:34:29 , level: 4, UP   NEW
urcite? ako vies? :)

000001010006353900934015054285970542860705428618054286230542862705428657
jejz
 jejz      02.07.2010 - 23:58:36 , level: 5, UP   NEW
ved isla asi pol metra od stredu.. ani to nie.

proste ked brankar tipuje smer a penalta je dobre kopnuta nechyti ani ked uhadne smer (druha penalta ghany).

00000101000635390093401505428597054286070542861805428623054286270542865705428709
eyo
 eyo      03.07.2010 - 00:42:40 , level: 6, UP   NEW
Nech by isla aj 10 cm od stredu, nemozes napisat urcite, mozno tak velmi pravedepodobne. Mozno by sa potkol a zlomil si krk. Jednoducho sa to nestalo tak mozes iba predpokladat nie konstatovat.

000001010006353900934015054285970542860705428618054286230542862705428629
||||||||||
 ||||||||||      02.07.2010 - 23:36:25 , level: 5, UP   NEW
jednoducho - je to brankar :)

00000101000635390093401505428597054286070542861805428623054286270542862905428637
eyo
 eyo      02.07.2010 - 23:43:39 , level: 6, UP   NEW
jaj, tak to uz hej. ja som si myslel, ze mas nejaky prehravac alternativnej minulosti :)

000001010006353900934015054285970542860705428615
chav
 chav      02.07.2010 - 23:28:00 , level: 2, UP   NEW
panenkofska!

000001010006353900934015054285970542860705428614
||||||||||
 ||||||||||      02.07.2010 - 23:27:08 , level: 2, UP   NEW
klasika

0000010100063539009340150542859705428601
krinkl cut
 krinkl cut      02.07.2010 - 23:09:11 , level: 1, UP   NEW
suhlas