cwbe coordinatez:
866
1551575
4651990
5296809

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::1
total children::1
show[ 2 | 3] flat


The Origins of Mindstorms

Papert has much to criticize about the way mathematics are taught to children. Although he was writing in the late 70s, the situation is not much better today, even though we have much better tools available to us for teaching math. The problem with mathematics education is that we are too far removed from the subject being taught. I was one of many high school students who believed that math had no connection to my life, and that I would never need to do more than balance a checkbook or count the correct change. The universe in which math made sense seemed far, far away from my day-to-day existence.

When children are young, they are incredibly facile learners. If your child were to spend some time in France, it is likely he or she will pick up quite a bit of French. "What would happen," asked Papert, "if children who can’t do math grew up in Mathland, a place that is to math what France is to French?"

menu.png
In the 1970s, Papert constructed a kind of Mathland using the LOGO programming language, and robotic turtles that could draw pictures. These tools were used by very young kids, who would not ordinarily be exposed to concepts like angles and polygons. A key component of Papert’s educational philosophy is self-directed learning. As kids build cool things in Mathland, they naturally encounter problems which require creative mathematical solutions. As a result, formerly abstract mathematical concepts take on a real meaning, and there are tangible rewards for tinkering with these concepts.

I am personally convinced that a year of making self-designed computer games (or any number of other hands-on activities) would be a superior replacement for the pre-algebra classes that are taught to middle schoolers. [to preto ten moj prirodzeny vztah k matike =)] Any time you create a situation in which your child needs math to accomplish something desirable, like making a robot, or a videogame, or a model airplane, you are taking your kid a little closer to Mathland. And that’s an amazing place to be.




0000086601551575046519900529680905296853
psycho
 psycho      17.04.2010 - 19:18:04 (modif: 24.04.2010 - 14:08:40) [1K] , level: 1, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
81403: ale tak ano, asi aj ja by som si myslel ze matika je nahovno, keby neviem, ze sa da fakt realne a prakticky vyuzit
psycho: nestava sa ti, ze o niecom citas co ani za boha nevies pochopit, a potom zrazu pochopis a zistis ze to bolo napicu napisane, ze to vies opisat lepsie, tak aby sa to dalo pochopit hned?
81403: stava, dost casto :p
psycho: -||- ;)




hm, citam clanok, v ktorom sa pise, ze v education musi byt repetitivnost
lenze je v tom problem, ze to ludi vacsinou nebavi

podla principu 'dobre musi bavit' z toho logicky vyplyva, ze ak tam musi byt repetitivnost (kvoli osvojeniu), tak ok, ale..
treba to spravit pozitivne, tj, ze motivacia k tomu musi vyplyvat z ineho nez z donutenia..
deti v ziadnom pripade nemozeme motivovat k robeniu ZLEHO, nemozu konat to co sa im prieci, pretoze si vytvaraju konformny bias, vytvara im to v hlave predstavu, ze obcas treba konat zlo - chceme toto davat do hlav buducim lekarom, politikom, policajtom, sefom, ucitelom??!

ak treba repetitivnost, tak treba zadat take ulohy (zmysluplne zaujimave), pri ktorych deti budu automaticky konat repetitivne, lebo to pre ne bude najzaujimavejsie riesenie.. repetitivnost zacina byt nudna ked uz to vies, z coho vyplyva, ze treba dat taku ulohu, pri ktorej treba repetitivnu cinnost len kym si dieta neosvoji dany princip..
cize nie "vyries toto repetitivne takymto postupom", ale treba zmenit pristup na "vyries toto po svojom, usmernime ta ak budes potrebovat"

a dieta mozno zacne repetitivne, ak to je postup, ktory si to vyzaduje na najdenie riesenia.. a akonahle to pochopi, tak uz nebude musiet pouzivat repetitivny postup - tym sme vyhrali hned na 3 miestach:
- dieta pochopilo
- dieta nebolo nutene do zleho, do toho co nechce (demokraticka sloboda nic? uz nezijeme v konformnom komunizme)
- dieta vynalozilo presne tolko energie kolko bolo potrebne, ziadna ZBYTOCNA repetitivna praca

a taktiez deti takto zistia, ze je ovela zabavnejsie prijst na riesenie sam, a nie akademicky sa nabiflit odpoved, lebo vlastne riesenia robia cloveka kreativnejsim.. ja som si kolkokrat pisal vzorce, kreslil geometriu, alebo skusal kodit repetitivne blbosti, aby som nejaky koncept pochopil.. a bol to uzasny pocit objavovania.. narozdiel od matiky v skole, ktoru som aj tak bud pochopil a bola to potom uz nudna, alebo nepochopil a z prikladov bez dalsieho vysvetlenia som nemal nic, znechucovalo ma to..

prekonavanie problemov svojim sposobom ma vzdy strasne bavilo..
je velke plytvanie potencialom deti, ak ich povazujeme za stroje a dame im sucho pocitat nudne priklady!