login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
17.07.2008-1:02:48
template:
4
parent:
BSD pro uplne zacatecniky
owner:
baronprasil
viewed by:
created:
17.07.2008 - 01:02:48
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63540
63542
2109677
940127
4149546
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
nejake skusenosti so zfs ?
title/content
title
content
user
00000101000635400006354202109677009401270414954604150187
juraj
17.07.2008 - 11:24:43
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re: 17.07.2008-1:02:48
na bsd ja nie, ale na solarise velke -- najlepsi FS ever.
0000010100063540000635420210967700940127041495460415018704151160
baronprasil
17.07.2008 - 15:34:30
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[2]: 17.07.2008-1:02:48
jj, na Solarisoch mi robi velku radost .]
-
Zle polozena otazka, teda:
Mate niekto skusenosti so ZFS na FreeBSD ?
000001010006354000063542021096770094012704149546041501870415116004189621
miloo
22.09.2008 - 12:24:20
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[3]: 17.07.2008-1:02:48
stale nepouzitelne
00000101000635400006354202109677009401270414954604150187041511600418962104195118
baronprasil
25.09.2008 - 00:21:43
, level: 4,
UP
NEW
Re[4]: 17.07.2008-1:02:48
ola
000001010006354000063542021096770094012704149546041501870415116004163597
DanGer
23.07.2008 - 09:37:09
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[3]: 17.07.2008-1:02:48
chvilu som to skusal, problemy neboli. akurat treba mat vela pamate...
00000101000635400006354202109677009401270414954604150187041511600416359704186579
20.09.2008 - 18:14:26
, level: 4,
UP
NEW
Re[4]: 17.07.2008-1:02:48
preco treba mat vela pamate? co zerie pamat najviac pri pouziti tohoto filesystemu?
0000010100063540000635420210967700940127041495460415018704151160041635970418657904186682
next
20.09.2008 - 19:17:03
, level: 5,
UP
NEW
Re[5]: 17.07.2008-1:02:48
ARC. Adaptive nieco Cache.
na 2GB stroji to pri 870GB zpoole [s _malo_ aktivitou] berie vyse 1GB RAM.
000001010006354000063542021096770094012704149546041501870415116004163597041865790418668204186794
20.09.2008 - 20:32:26
, level: 6,
UP
NEW
Re[6]: 17.07.2008-1:02:48
to vtom pripade musi byt pekne rychly ten filesystem. (adaptive replacement cache)
00000101000635400006354202109677009401270414954604150187041511600416359704186579041866820418679404187388
next
21.09.2008 - 10:36:55
, level: 7,
UP
NEW
Re[7]: 17.07.2008-1:02:48
ZFS vseobecne je dost rychle. Na tom konkretnom stroji sa toho moc nedeje. Takze ZFS je rychlejsie nez treba. A tam kde sa nieco deje nemam zmeranu velkost ARC. Niekedy to spravim a poviem vam.
0000010100063540000635420210967700940127041495460415018704151160041635970418657904186682041867940418738804188627
21.09.2008 - 21:45:24
, level: 8,
UP
NEW
Re[8]: 17.07.2008-1:02:48
no v podstate mi ide len o to, ze premyslam nad kupou Raid karty s integrovanou 128MB cache pamatou, ale mozno by som radsej za tie prachy kupil RAMku a pouzil takyto nejaky filesystem co tu RAMku pouzije ako cache.
pojdem si vsak aspon nieco precitat o tom, nech viem ake su teoreticke predpoklady tohoto filesystemu. porovnam si a uvidim.
dik zatim za info.