login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
times best photos of year 2006
template:
4
parent:
Reportazna a dokumentarna fotografia
owner:
tomas
viewed by:
created:
16.12.2006 - 23:41:48
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63537
758948
2009649
2813357
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::
total children::2
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
http://www.time.com/time/yip/2006/
sa mi pacili 2,7,9,10,13velmi,15,17,22,24
18vobec
a niektore sa mi nezobrazili.neviem preco
title/content
title
content
user
000001010006353700758948020096490281335702813657
jakub09
17.12.2006 - 10:05:19
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re: times best photos of year 2006
dobre su vsetky, maju v sebe pribeh, ale ta 24 je uz trochu arrange
00000101000635370075894802009649028133570281365702814203
Robin
17.12.2006 - 15:46:18
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re: times best photos of year 2006
nepovedal by som.
0000010100063537007589480200964902813357028136570281420302814598
jakub09
17.12.2006 - 19:44:21
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[2]: times best photos of year 2006
tebe sa nepacia alebo ta 24?
000001010006353700758948020096490281335702813657028142030281459802814953
Robin
17.12.2006 - 23:04:19
, level: 4,
UP
NEW
Re[2]: times best photos of year 2006
V podstate aj aj ale to prve je na dlho a nechce sa mi selektivne pisat ku kazdej fotke.
24 imho nie je aranzovana. Aj ked za aranzovanie sa da povazovat ranny nastup alebo vecerna porada. Aj ked to nearanzuje fotograf.?.?
00000101000635370075894802009649028133570281365702814203028145980281495302814970
tomas
17.12.2006 - 23:12:30
, level: 5,
UP
NEW
Re: Re[2]: times best photos of year 2006
on to myslel ze to vyzera ako fotografom aranzovana fotografia
vtomje rozdiel
ak sa demonstranti sami odseba postavia k nejakej tabuli do ulicky,lebo vedia ze to budu vsetci cvakat tak je to nimi aranzovane ale fotograf do toho nezasahoval.
ak ty povies napr skautom aby sa postavili tam a tam ( ;0) tak je to fotografom aranzovana fotka.
Ta 24rka mohla vzniknut tak ze si vojak proste sadol,kukol von a fotograf to cvakol.Ale takisto mu mohol fotograf povedat nech si tam sadne a tam kukne.
Ak to podla mna urobil tak to tam malo byt napisane inak to imho je proti etike.
0000010100063537007589480200964902813357028136570281420302814598028149530281497002815677
Robin
18.12.2006 - 11:46:14
, level: 6,
UP
NEW
Re: Re[2]: times best photos of year 2006
Jasne ved som napisal to iste len z inej strany.
Zostava tu ale otazka, ze ak volaky dej prebieha mimo fotografovej pritomnosti a ked do neho fotograf vstupi ho prerusi. Je jeho obnova aranzovanim? Popripade ak volaky dej prebieha a fotograf ho volakym gestom predlzi...
000001010006353700758948020096490281335702813657028142030281459802814953028149700281567702815833
tomas
18.12.2006 - 12:59:57
, level: 7,
UP
NEW
Re: Re: Re[2]: times best photos of year 2006
tosu tie otazky novinarskej etiky.
to by sme mohli dlhsie o tom pokecat, ale asi naj je riesit konkretne situacie.
00000101000635370075894802009649028133570281365702814203028145980281495302814960
Robin
17.12.2006 - 23:07:19
, level: 5,
UP
NEW
Re[2]: times best photos of year 2006
Vacsinu povazujem za silne a dobre.
00000101000635370075894802009649028133570281365702813991
tomas
17.12.2006 - 13:59:04
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
24
moze ale nemusi.
ale ano, vyzera to tak
000001010006353700758948020096490281335702813409
slobo
17.12.2006 - 00:24:48
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re: times best photos of year 2006
ja som na jednej fotke spoznal jedneho cloveka :D
potesilo ma to dost..