login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
Re[5]: 27.09.2006-14:13:34
template:
4
parent:
Re[4]: 27.09.2006-14:13:34
owner:
lts
viewed by:
created:
27.09.2006 - 16:53:47
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63540
63541
982187
2656370
2656377
2656431
2656508
2656754
2656788
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::
total children::1
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
Mam XGA na HP, da to len 1024x768....
mi to prislo tak ze wtf kolko ti to ma dat ked nie 1024 :)
title/content
title
content
user
0000010100063540000635410098218702656370026563770265643102656508026567540265678802659658
azazel_the_real_one{outKasted}{outKasted}
28.09.2006 - 23:24:53
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re[6]: 27.09.2006-14:13:34
Trosku inak som to myslel :) Lepsi display nemusi mat nutne len lepsie rozlisenie. Kukni sa na nejaky suntovy notas so suntovou SXGA. Proste sice vysoke rozlisenie, ale lacnota. Vidis na nom len take sede sracky, ked sa kukas trosku z uhla, co niekedy dokaze byt otravne.
SXGA je dobra vec, ale cisto ako kriterium by som to nebral. Zavisi aj od prevedenia.