login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
28.01.2005-2:35:09
template:
4
parent:
thus spoke maniac in 'Foto Post
Processing'
owner:
tomas
viewed by:
created:
28.01.2005 - 02:35:09
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63537
758948
1374005
1245085
1371599
1373413
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
так
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::
total children::2
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
mozno som len unaveny ale vobec nechapem o com tocis
title/content
title
content
user
0000010100063537007589480137400501245085013715990137341301374450
maniac
28.01.2005 - 12:27:30
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
thus spoke maniac in 'Foto Post Processing'
proste to co je na papieri tak je mierne do zelena zafarbene, ma to mensi kontrast a je to svetlejsie.
pripada mi to ako keby ten fajl nekonvertovali pred tlacou sposobom sRGB -> CMYK ale AdobeRGB -> CMYK
000001010006353700758948013740050124508501371599013734130137445001374474
maniac
28.01.2005 - 12:31:41
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
thus spoke maniac in 'Foto Post Processing'
totiz ten subor ked som dal tlacit tak sa volal _img1234.tif
a mam taky pocit ze niektore softy ked vidia na zaciatku mena suboru _ tak to beru ako AdobeRGB. sudim podla toho, ze 20D tak pomenovava subory ked sa jedna o AdobeRGB.
00000101000635370075894801374005012450850137159901373413013744500137447401376798
tomas
29.01.2005 - 01:19:40
, level: 3,
UP
NEW
29.01.2005-1:19:40
nee.soft si bere info o farebnom priestore zo suboru,nie z nazvu.
mozno to konvertli najprv vsetko do srgb a potom cmyk ale taka otazka:
ked vies ze sa to bude tlacit v CMYKU preci si to neprekonvertoval sam?
aspon by si hned vydel ten rozdiel (ktory tam vzdy bude)
myslim ze to by vyriesilo tvoj problem
0000010100063537007589480137400501245085013715990137341301374450013744740137679801376937
maniac
29.01.2005 - 09:15:54
, level: 4,
UP
NEW
29.01.2005-9:15:54
nevedel som ze to davaju do CMYKu
a ja ked to u seba skonvertujem do cmyku tak to ma take iste farby ako v sRGB - tak by to aj malo byt predsa. rozdiely su len vtedy ked pracujeme so surobom v inom farebnom formate ako naozaj je zapisany
moj tif bol z gimpu a neniesol ziadnu farebnu informaciu..
000001010006353700758948013740050124508501371599013734130137445001374474013767980137693701377677
tomas
29.01.2005 - 15:08:46
, level: 5,
UP
NEW
thus spoke tomas in 'Foto Post Processing'
to sa da?
tiff bez farebnej informacie?
nemozes mat rovnaky obraz v cmyku ako srgb.to je logika.nieco robis zle......
00000101000635370075894801374005012450850137159901373413013744500137447401376798013769370137767701378887
maniac
30.01.2005 - 00:29:28
, level: 6,
UP
NEW
thus spoke maniac in 'thus spoke tomas in 'Foto Post Processing''
mas obrazok v sRGB. skonvertujes ho korektne do CMYKu. vysledok musi vyzerat rovnako ako original, n~e ?
0000010100063537007589480137400501245085013715990137341301374450013744740137679801376937013776770137888701380921
tomas
30.01.2005 - 22:58:52
, level: 7,
UP
NEW
thus spoke tomas in 'Foto Post Processing'
nie lebo gamut, tj rozsah farieb RGB a CMYK je rozdielny
0000010100063537007589480137400501245085013715990137341301373857
pe:
28.01.2005 - 10:17:10
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
thus spoke p in 'Foto Post Processing'
nastavenie farebneho prostredia asi, shift/ctrl + k
defaultne je fotoshop nastaveny do sRGB, co je vsak shit shitovy, malo by to byt v adobe 1998
alebo nieco ine je vo veci?