login::
pass::
name::
id::
node:
04.07.2025-16:33:34
template:
4
parent:
Bitcoin (The Church of Satoshi and
Latter Day Coins)
owner:
ulkas
viewed by:
created:
04.07.2025 - 16:33:34
cwbe coordinatez
:
101
63540
63590
5734320
9252865
ABSOLUT
K
YBERIA
permissions
you:
r,
system:
public
net:
yes
⠪
neurons
stats
|
by_visit
|
by_K
source
tiamat
K
|
my_K
|
given_K
last
commanders
polls
total descendants::5
total children::2
1
❤️
show[
2
|
3
]
flat
miner co kedysi mal 200k coinov zacal consolidovat stare adresy:
https://x.com/jconorgrogan/status/1941128251856032055
title/content
title
content
user
000001010006354000063590057343200925286509253071
Prospero
06.07.2025 - 11:52:27
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
cold death of shitcoin, episode 0
Je to celkom vtipne, obzvlast v kontexte toho pre-halving narativu o tom ako znizenie supply vystreli cenu radikalne nahor.
A zrazu hokus-pokus, jedna velryba sa otoci na druhy bok a da do pohybu tolko shbitcoinov kolko budu mineri krvopotne dolovat najblizsieho pol roka...
00000101000635400006359005734320092528650925307109253096
niekt0
06.07.2025 - 14:06:35
[
1K
] , level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re: cold death of shitcoin, episode 0
Skus si rozanalyzovat dlhodobe a kratkodobe vplyvy.
Znizenie pritoku novych mincii do siete nesposobi "radikalne vystrelenie ceny nahor", ten len spomali inflaciu. Radikalne pohyby ceny su sposobovane ocakavaniami ludi, a ich pokusmi o predpovedanie reakcii ostatnych. Dlhodobo ale spomalenie inflacie samozrejme vplyv na cenu mat bude, a to znacny.
000001010006354000063590057343200925286509252867
ulkas
04.07.2025 - 16:57:59
, level: 1,
UP
NEW
Re: 04.07.2025-16:33:34
co myslite, ze je dovodom? ja osobne si nemyslim, ze niekto, kto chce zrealizovat zisk, by mal potrebu zrovna narazovo predat take kvantum. skor sa mi vynaraju taketo moznosti:
- konsolidacia penazeniek a nejaky dlhodobejsi projekt, napriklad prevadzkovanie LN supernodov
- kradez coinov v priamom prenose
- rodina si deli dedicstvo, napriklad mozno rodina hala finneyho
00000101000635400006359005734320092528650925286709252956
gab
05.07.2025 - 11:49:41
, level: 2,
UP
NEW
Re[2]: 04.07.2025-16:33:34
ocakava sa velky dip po schvaleni Trumpovho billu, mozno to precital a chce profit
0000010100063540000635900573432009252865092528670925295609252957
gab
05.07.2025 - 11:55:18
[
2K
] , level: 3,
UP
NEW
Re[3]: 04.07.2025-16:33:34
Hayes mal clanok, ktory uz stiahli ale tu je TLDR dzepetom spracovana verzia
TL;DR – the super-short version
Washington just discovered a new money hose:
Big-name U.S. banks (JPMorgan, Citi, etc.) will soon roll out their own dollar stablecoins. That lets them turn trillions of sleepy customer deposits into on-chain tokens that never sleep.
Why the government loves it:
Stablecoin balances can be stuffed into ultra-short T-bills.
With fresh capital-relief rules (SLR tweaks) the banks can lever those T-bills almost for free.
Net result: up to $6.8 T of instant demand for Treasury debt without the Fed needing to resume QE.
Why the Fed might help, too:
If Congress yanks the interest the Fed pays on reserves (IORB), banks will shove another $3.3 T of idle cash into the same T-bills. Add it up → ≈ $10 T of stealth bond-buying firepower.
Who loses?
Fintech issuers like Circle can’t pay interest and can’t compete with the “too-big-to-fail” guarantee. The new stablecoin rules (the “Genius Act”) basically lock them out.
Trading takeaways:
Short-term (Q3 ’25): a Treasury-cash-account refill could drain liquidity and chop Bitcoin/Nasdaq.
Medium-term (post-Jackson Hole): once the new debt ceiling is set and stablecoin plumbing is live, the liquidity wave returns; author targets Bitcoin six-figures → $1 M by ’28, Nasdaq 5×.
Biggest non-consensus play: long an equal basket of the big U.S. banks (184 % upside from stablecoin cost-savings + NIM).
Bottom line:
Stablecoins aren’t a DeFi revolution; they’re a back-door bailout mechanism for funding giant U.S. deficits while propping up risk assets. Ride the wave (Bitcoin, TBTF banks), don’t wait for Powell to say “QE.”